newsrackblog.com

a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 6 other subscribers

  • Recent Comments

    • William J Urmson on The photograph that ought to defeat the NRA
    • Vanessa Elizebeth on Van Hollen OK on Medicare — but “willing to consider” Social Security “spending reform”
    • stephen on The Monday after: “Stop the NRA” rally on Capitol Hill
    • Nell on Zero Dark de Triomphe
    • Thomas Nephew on Van Hollen, Geithner reassure on earned benefits — but just for now
    • Nell on Van Hollen, Geithner reassure on earned benefits — but just for now
    • Thomas Nephew on Assassinating negotiation
    • Nell on Assassinating negotiation
    • Nell on Assassinating negotiation
    • Nell on Assassinating negotiation
    • Thomas Nephew on Assassinating negotiation
    • Nell on Assassinating negotiation
  • Recent Trackbacks

  • Real News

  • RSS my delicious

    • PRISM: Solving for X (Ashkan Soltani, 6/14/13)
      "I thought it would be a fun exercise to describe PRISM based on information publicly available through the press, private companies, and the DNI. Specifically, how would this system look if we took all the statements made at face value? This might be a stretch, but it seems like a worthwhile exercise – not unlike a multivariate equation when one or mor […]
    • Immigration enforcement: a trojan horse? (Buttar, BORDC)
      "Comprehensive immigration reform, along with the fiscal cliff and sequester, has recently dominated Washington. But observers have overlooked how calls for stronger immigration enforcement could undermine the rights of not only immigrants, but also US citizens." […]
    • How Obama lost his voice, and how he can get it back (Marshall Ganz, Nov'10, LATimes)
      Accurate surface observations, but I think Obama was always non-transformational at heart. He didn't lose his voice--he stopped throwing it.. -- "Transformational" leadership engages followers in the risky and often exhilarating work of changing the world, work that often changes the activists themselves. Its sources are shared values that bec […]
    • American Assassinations For Dummies (Ames, NSFWCorp)
      " ignorance of the history of assassination policy runs right through today, with the repetition of another myth: That President Obama’s extrajudicial drone-assassinations of American citizens is "unprecedented" and "radical" and that "not even George Bush targeted American citizens." The truth is a lot worse and a lot more […]
    • That Seventies Show (Perlstein, The Nation, Nov '10)
      Great review of a number of books about the political and social changes in the U.S during the 1970s. […]
    • What Happened After a Nation Methodically Murdered Its Schizophrenics? (Levine, Truthout)
      "Starting with results of the Nazi elimination of diagnosed schizophrenics, Levine re-examines the evidence for the heritability of mental illness and offers some suggestions about Western civilization and our shared humanity. If a nation murdered and sterilized an estimated 73 percent to 100 percent of its diagnosed schizophrenics, yet a generation lat […]
    • 2013 Presidential Address (Berube, MLA Convention)
      "The working conditions of college faculty are ultimately the learning conditions for college students. If you got here because you love what you do—or even if you are just mildly happy to have a decent job—you owe it to your colleagues, to your profession, to your students, and even to yourself to try to see to it that each and every one of us can cond […]
    • Misguided Social Security ‘Reform’ - NYTimes.com
      "elderly households tend to have lower incomes and lower expenditures than younger households, and that more of their purchases are for needs that cannot be met by switching to products and services in unrelated categories. That indicates that they do not have the same flexibility as younger households to respond to price changes while still maintaining […]
    • The Truth about Aaron Swartz’s “Crime” (Stamos, "Unhandled Exception")
      Expert witness for the defense demolishes case against the young Internet activist and prodigy who took his life earlier this weekend: "Aaron Swartz was not the super hacker breathlessly described in the Government’s indictment and forensic reports, and his actions did not pose a real danger to JSTOR, MIT or the public. He was an intelligent young man w […]
    • The Myth Of Hitler’s Gun Ban (The Propaganda Professor)
      "Hitler really did enact a new gun law. But it was in 1938, not 1935 – well after the NAZIs already had the country in its iron grip. Furthermore, the new law in many ways LOOSENED gun restrictions. For example, it greatly expanded the numbers who were exempt, it lowered the legal age of possession from 20 to 18, and it completely lifted restriction on […]
  • Subscribe

  • E-mail subscribe

  • Meta

Blogged.com

2010HCP

2010 Health Care Pledge for a public option or single payer health care system

Congress, why do you ignore the majority
Public option supporter, 9/13/09

The goal of this pledge is for Americans who support either a “public option” or a “single payer” health care system to motivate their representatives and senators in the strongest way possible: by withholding any support from candidates who failed to vote for a bill including either provision.

The pledge:

We, the undersigned, pledge not to support and to oppose *any and all* incumbents (Democrat, Republican, or otherwise) in the Senate or House in 2010 who

(1) voted against each of (a) a public option and (b) a single payer health care reform bill (HR 676) in the 111th Congress when the opportunity before the full House or Senate arose, or who
(2) demonstrably prevented the possibility of such votes (e.g., by voting to allow filibusters to continue), or
(3) who voted for a reconciliation bill that failed to incorporate either a public option or single payer option, or
(4) — if no such votes take place — who failed to co-sponsor such reforms or vote for them in applicable committees.

By “support,” we mean
(1) contributing money to,
(2) working as campaign volunteers for, or
(3) voting for such incumbents.

By “oppose,” we mean supporting suitable primary challengers to such incumbents whenever possible, and supporting suitable third party challengers in the general election whenever that is necessary to provide a choice for single payer or public option health care reform on the 2010 general election ballot.

By “public option,” we mean an immediate public option, not one “triggered” by future events (since experience shows Congress routinely ignores such triggers), and not a system of “regional coops” (since these are likely to create a “race to the bottom” state with the weakest health insurance legislation).

This petition is not affiliated with any organization, but those who sign it will have self-identified as people who will only support proponents of meaningful, structural health care reform, and should seek out such candidates.

Once health care reform situation is clarified by final votes or filibusters, I’ll do the following:

  • Provide a list of “F’s on health care reform” — Senators and Representatives who have failed to meet any of the four conditions above, and where possible, a list of their primary and/or general election opponents.
  • Notify suitable challengers (who do support single payer or public option) to these candidates of the possibility of petition signers’ support by directing them to the petition.
  • Contact petition signers with an message seeking permission  to send occasional additional messages as the 2010 election campaign season proceeds, and suitable challengers to “F’s on health care reform” are found.  I will not provide any petition signer’s email addresses to any candidate.

This space will serve as a place for updates on the progress of the petition and the progress towards a public option or single payer health care system.

Print This Print This

One Response to “2010HCP”

  1. newsrackblog.com » Blog Archive » Never say never: more debate about the public option Says:

    [...] Posted by Thomas Nephew on September 22nd, 2009 Click to  pledge that if incumbents vote against both a “public option” and “single payer,” you’ll work against them in 2010.  More here. [...]