<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;First of all, I know both those guys&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newsrackblog.com/2010/02/11/first-of-all-i-know-both-those-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newsrackblog.com/2010/02/11/first-of-all-i-know-both-those-guys/</link>
	<description>a citizen's journal by Thomas Nephew</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: newsrackblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Things like ethics</title>
		<link>http://newsrackblog.com/2010/02/11/first-of-all-i-know-both-those-guys/#comment-7449</link>
		<dc:creator>newsrackblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Things like ethics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 15:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrackblog.com/?p=2702#comment-7449</guid>
		<description>[...] of course, having the right buddies helps. Remember Obama&#8217;s &#8220;First of all, I know both these guys&#8221;? Again, it&#8217;s not actually ethics, just something that is a thing like ethics &#8212; call it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of course, having the right buddies helps. Remember Obama&#8217;s &#8220;First of all, I know both these guys&#8221;? Again, it&#8217;s not actually ethics, just something that is a thing like ethics &#8212; call it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insurance adjuster</title>
		<link>http://newsrackblog.com/2010/02/11/first-of-all-i-know-both-those-guys/#comment-6690</link>
		<dc:creator>insurance adjuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrackblog.com/?p=2702#comment-6690</guid>
		<description>in today's modern finanical markets -- in order to make a buck, all you need to do is get your pals at the FED to print a buck. Of course, the sucker for Wall Street is the general public who saves $.  The talk about loans and TARP payback is nothing more than a David Copperfield Jedi mind trick for the uninformed masses. Look up the term Seigniorage or Quant Easing - the official FED name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in today&#8217;s modern finanical markets &#8212; in order to make a buck, all you need to do is get your pals at the FED to print a buck. Of course, the sucker for Wall Street is the general public who saves $.  The talk about loans and TARP payback is nothing more than a David Copperfield Jedi mind trick for the uninformed masses. Look up the term Seigniorage or Quant Easing - the official FED name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Nephew</title>
		<link>http://newsrackblog.com/2010/02/11/first-of-all-i-know-both-those-guys/#comment-6655</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Nephew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrackblog.com/?p=2702#comment-6655</guid>
		<description>Thanks, "WWW".  Yes, I think Obama never really got the extent to which Bush, Paulson, and the financial sector took a great big dump on his presidency before it ever got going -- and probably never figured they couldn't believe their eyes when he picked the likes of Geithner and Emanuel to help run the new ship.  We needed a new New Deal, we got pretty much the same old deal with a little "hope and change" bow on top.  The net spending freeze on the heels of the MA election was the kind of leadership you'd expect of McClellan, not a Lincoln.  Like McC, Obama strikes me as someone who is permanently conceding the other side maybe outnumbers him and maybe has a point, rather than of someone who knows what he needs to do to win what he knows he has to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, &#8220;WWW&#8221;.  Yes, I think Obama never really got the extent to which Bush, Paulson, and the financial sector took a great big dump on his presidency before it ever got going &#8212; and probably never figured they couldn&#8217;t believe their eyes when he picked the likes of Geithner and Emanuel to help run the new ship.  We needed a new New Deal, we got pretty much the same old deal with a little &#8220;hope and change&#8221; bow on top.  The net spending freeze on the heels of the MA election was the kind of leadership you&#8217;d expect of McClellan, not a Lincoln.  Like McC, Obama strikes me as someone who is permanently conceding the other side maybe outnumbers him and maybe has a point, rather than of someone who knows what he needs to do to win what he knows he has to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WorldWideWeber</title>
		<link>http://newsrackblog.com/2010/02/11/first-of-all-i-know-both-those-guys/#comment-6654</link>
		<dc:creator>WorldWideWeber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrackblog.com/?p=2702#comment-6654</guid>
		<description>Great post, Thomas. Normally I'm a big fan of nuance. But a politician must respond to the exigencies of the times, and here Obama fails. We needed Alexander the Great, and we got Aristotle. We needed someone with a trial lawyer's ability to distill a complicated argument into a memorable and stirring summation, and we got a constitutional law professor. And I agree wholeheartedly about the dangers posed by Palin and her ilk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Thomas. Normally I&#8217;m a big fan of nuance. But a politician must respond to the exigencies of the times, and here Obama fails. We needed Alexander the Great, and we got Aristotle. We needed someone with a trial lawyer&#8217;s ability to distill a complicated argument into a memorable and stirring summation, and we got a constitutional law professor. And I agree wholeheartedly about the dangers posed by Palin and her ilk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

