newsrackblog.com

a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

  • Recent Comments

    • insurance adjuster on “First of all, I know both those guys”
    • Thomas Nephew on Lessons of the Snowpocalypse
    • RobertNAtl on Lessons of the Snowpocalypse
    • RobertNAtl on Lessons of the Snowpocalypse
    • Thomas Nephew on “First of all, I know both those guys”
    • WorldWideWeber on “First of all, I know both those guys”
    • chris on "Their voice. Amplified." or Why I’m banning 151.200.70.* comments
    • Maddie on Aw, shoot
    • Maddie on The option - the option - the public wants options!
    • Maddie on The option - the option - the public wants options!
    • Thomas Nephew on “Law and the Long War,” by Benjamin Wittes - a blog discussion
    • Bill Day on “Law and the Long War,” by Benjamin Wittes - a blog discussion
  • Recent Trackbacks

    • Get FISA Right: Ideas for Change 2010: how you can help!
    • Threads: over the territory of Nagorno-Karabagh. Although some elements in the Armenian diaspora expressed...
    • Talk Islam: Aziz suggested I notify TI of a series o…
    • Energy 2.0: CAFE oh, yay?
    • Mick Arran: The Troy Davis Conundrum (Updated)
    • Mick Arran: The Troy Davis Conundrum
  • Real News

  • RSS my delicious

    • Palin Crossed Border For Canadian Health Care (Stein, HuffPo)
      "We used to hustle over the border for health care we received in Canada," Palin said in her first Canadian appearance since stepping down as governor of Alaska. "And I think now, isn't that ironic?"
    • The Limits of Rahmism (Baker, NYTimes Mag)
      “I’ve been in a White House before when we lost both the House and the Senate in ’94,” he said, according to notes taken separately by two people in the room. “In about 12 hours, we’re all going to be stupid. Like Axe says, you’re never as smart as they say you are when you win, and you’re not as stupid as they say you are when you lose. We were smart before. Now we’ll be stupid.” Focus on the "I've been in the White House before when" part: Rahm was stupid then, he's stupid now, he's been stupid all along.
    • FPL Experiments With Solar Thermal at Gas-Fired Power Plant - NYTimes.com
      "When it is completed by the end of the year, this vast project will be the world’s second-largest solar plant. But that is not its real novelty. The solar array is being grafted onto the back of the nation’s largest fossil-fuel power plant, fired by natural gas. It is an experiment in whether conventional power generation can be married with renewable power in a way that lowers costs and spares the environment."
    • Cops vs. Kids in New York City Schools (Herbert, NYTimes)
      "These are all incidents that are familiar, or should be familiar, to Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who went out of his way to demand control of the public schools, and Mr. Kelly, who is in charge of the police and the school safety officers. But we don’t hear much from them about the abuse of children in the public schools. They’ll crow at the drop of a hat about crime going down. But when the abuse of innocent children is up for discussion, their silence is something to behold."
    • Who Would Want Credit For Iraq? (Larison, The Am.Conservative)
      "It is bad enough that our government unleashed this hell on people who had never actually done America any harm, but it is unconscionable that any of us celebrate what has been done as if it were something good and worthwhile."
    • How Facebook Was Founded (Carlson, Business Insider)
      "But, naturally, the possibility that the hard drive contained additional evidence set inquiring minds wondering what those emails and IMs revealed. Specifically, it set inquiring minds wondering again whether Mark had, in fact, stolen the Winklevoss's idea, screwed them over, and then ridden off into the sunset with Facebook." (He settled for $65M, so what we're learning is the Winklevosses may have settled for less than they could have gotten.) But Zuckerberg also proved willing and able to hack people's accounts using facebook data -- 5 years ago, but still.
    • Courting Fear (Alexander - Slate review of Courting Disaster by Marc Thiessen)
      "But if you're not an expert on a subject, shouldn't you interview experts before expressing an opinion? Instead, Thiessen relies solely on the opinions of the CIA interrogators who used torture and abuse and are thus most vulnerable to prosecution for war crimes. That makes his book less a serious discussion of interrogation policy than a literary defense of war criminals."
    • Rove Protects the Rear (Corn, Mother Jones)
      "Mother Jones has produced a timeline that lists the false Bush administration assertions. And to remind Rove—and book reviewers—here's a limited sampling of notable whoppers, reported in my books and elsewhere."
    • The revision thing: A history of the Iraq war, told entirely in lies (Sam Smith, Harper's Magazine)
      "Once again, we were defending both ourselves and the safety and survival of civilization itself. September 11 signaled the arrival of an entirely different era. We faced perils we had never thought about, perils we had never seen before. For decades, terrorists had waged war against this country. Now, under the leadership of President Bush, America would wage war against them. It was a struggle between good and it was a struggle between evil."
    • Obama advisers set to recommend military tribunals for alleged 9/11 plotters (Kornblut, Finn, WaPo)
      "President Obama's advisers are nearing a recommendation that Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, be prosecuted in a military tribunal, administration officials said, a step that would reverse Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.'s plan to try him in civilian court in New York City. "
  • Meta

  • Subscribe

Howard Dean on health care: let the American people choose

Posted by Thomas Nephew on June 12th, 2009

This is a cheap post — just an embedded video, a bit of transcription,  and a big “thank you” to eRobin who’s working hard on this issue.

Dean is great at turning the debate around to where it needs to go: a public option offers freedom of choice and builds the American economy. He also subscribes to the notion that single payer can evolve from the “public option,” rather than insisting on going directly to “Go” and collecting the savings that would result that way. Great quotes:

This is about the future of the American economy. We’re not just losing jobs to China, we’re losing jobs to Canada because their health care system is better for business than our health care system is. [...]

You can sign up for a public plan like Medicare or you can sign up for a private plan. You get the choice. You get the choice. And that’s … why the Republicans are in trouble here. They want to keep the choice for themselves, they want to make the choice for you, but we think it’s time now that the American people get to make the choice themselves. [...]

The only way we’re going to get to a single payer is if that’s what the American people want. … Look we had some health insurance companies leave our state when we forced all the insurance companies to issue health insurance regardless of the health of the individual and when we forced them to not charge more than 20% more for their sick patients than for their healthiest patients. And the bad ones left the state. And that was a good thing! We need to get some of these health insurance companies to behave themselves, and the best way to do it — the only way we’ve discovered in 40 years — is to offer an option. Let the American people choose. That’s all the Democrats are asking: let the American people choose. [...]

I understand why the insurance companies are against this, because they would have to clean up their act. But I don’t understand why the Republicans are against it. I thought the Republicans were interested in giving *more* choices to the American people, but apparently they’re not, and that is wrong, and if we have to pass this thing with 51 votes we should do it…

They may be on the sidelines, relatively speaking, but if worthwhile health care reform happens it will also be thanks to Howard Dean, and to all the activists and organizers like Robin who’ve been working so hard and so long towards this goal.

UPDATE: It occurs to me to mention a Prosperity Agenda item by Kevin Zeese that I posted on Facebook a few days ago, via which I found  Medical Bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a National Study (.PDF), an article by David Himmelstein, Deborath Thorne, Elizabeth Warren,  and Steffie Woolhandler in the American Journal of Medicine.  From the results section of the abstract (emphases added):

Using a conservative definition, 62.1% of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical; 92% of these medical debtors had medical debts over $5000, or 10% of pretax family income. The rest met criteria for medical bankruptcy because they had lost significant income due to illness or mortgaged a home to pay medical bills. Most medical debtors were well educated, owned homes, and had middle-class occupations. Three quarters had health insurance. Using identical definitions in 2001 and 2007, the share of bankruptcies attributable to medical problems rose by 49.6%. In logistic regression analysis controlling for demographic factors, the odds that a bankruptcy had a medical cause was 2.38-fold higher in 2007 than in 2001.

As I wrote at the time,* the outlines of this outrage were already apparent to these authors back in 2005. But despite their research and outreach at the time, a Dickensian bankruptcy bill (sponsored by Joe Biden) was passed that made no allowance for these kinds of undeserved financial disasters.  Clearly the health care and financial security of average Americans generally take a back seat to the care and feeding of financial CEOs. I hope this time will be different; perhaps the bankruptcy bill was all part of Joe Biden’s elaborate ten-dimensional chess strategy to achieve single payer health care.

=====
* The titles, “Bankruptcy Bill Hackery” and “Bankruptcy Bill Hackery: The Sequel,” refer to a critic of the study, not to Himmelstein et al.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>