newsrackblog.com

a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

  • Recent Comments

    • insurance adjuster on “First of all, I know both those guys”
    • Thomas Nephew on Lessons of the Snowpocalypse
    • RobertNAtl on Lessons of the Snowpocalypse
    • RobertNAtl on Lessons of the Snowpocalypse
    • Thomas Nephew on “First of all, I know both those guys”
    • WorldWideWeber on “First of all, I know both those guys”
    • chris on "Their voice. Amplified." or Why I’m banning 151.200.70.* comments
    • Maddie on Aw, shoot
    • Maddie on The option - the option - the public wants options!
    • Maddie on The option - the option - the public wants options!
    • Thomas Nephew on “Law and the Long War,” by Benjamin Wittes - a blog discussion
    • Bill Day on “Law and the Long War,” by Benjamin Wittes - a blog discussion
  • Recent Trackbacks

    • Get FISA Right: Ideas for Change 2010: how you can help!
    • Threads: over the territory of Nagorno-Karabagh. Although some elements in the Armenian diaspora expressed...
    • Talk Islam: Aziz suggested I notify TI of a series o…
    • Energy 2.0: CAFE oh, yay?
    • Mick Arran: The Troy Davis Conundrum (Updated)
    • Mick Arran: The Troy Davis Conundrum
  • Real News

  • RSS my delicious

    • Palin Crossed Border For Canadian Health Care (Stein, HuffPo)
      "We used to hustle over the border for health care we received in Canada," Palin said in her first Canadian appearance since stepping down as governor of Alaska. "And I think now, isn't that ironic?"
    • The Limits of Rahmism (Baker, NYTimes Mag)
      “I’ve been in a White House before when we lost both the House and the Senate in ’94,” he said, according to notes taken separately by two people in the room. “In about 12 hours, we’re all going to be stupid. Like Axe says, you’re never as smart as they say you are when you win, and you’re not as stupid as they say you are when you lose. We were smart before. Now we’ll be stupid.” Focus on the "I've been in the White House before when" part: Rahm was stupid then, he's stupid now, he's been stupid all along.
    • FPL Experiments With Solar Thermal at Gas-Fired Power Plant - NYTimes.com
      "When it is completed by the end of the year, this vast project will be the world’s second-largest solar plant. But that is not its real novelty. The solar array is being grafted onto the back of the nation’s largest fossil-fuel power plant, fired by natural gas. It is an experiment in whether conventional power generation can be married with renewable power in a way that lowers costs and spares the environment."
    • Cops vs. Kids in New York City Schools (Herbert, NYTimes)
      "These are all incidents that are familiar, or should be familiar, to Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who went out of his way to demand control of the public schools, and Mr. Kelly, who is in charge of the police and the school safety officers. But we don’t hear much from them about the abuse of children in the public schools. They’ll crow at the drop of a hat about crime going down. But when the abuse of innocent children is up for discussion, their silence is something to behold."
    • Who Would Want Credit For Iraq? (Larison, The Am.Conservative)
      "It is bad enough that our government unleashed this hell on people who had never actually done America any harm, but it is unconscionable that any of us celebrate what has been done as if it were something good and worthwhile."
    • How Facebook Was Founded (Carlson, Business Insider)
      "But, naturally, the possibility that the hard drive contained additional evidence set inquiring minds wondering what those emails and IMs revealed. Specifically, it set inquiring minds wondering again whether Mark had, in fact, stolen the Winklevoss's idea, screwed them over, and then ridden off into the sunset with Facebook." (He settled for $65M, so what we're learning is the Winklevosses may have settled for less than they could have gotten.) But Zuckerberg also proved willing and able to hack people's accounts using facebook data -- 5 years ago, but still.
    • Courting Fear (Alexander - Slate review of Courting Disaster by Marc Thiessen)
      "But if you're not an expert on a subject, shouldn't you interview experts before expressing an opinion? Instead, Thiessen relies solely on the opinions of the CIA interrogators who used torture and abuse and are thus most vulnerable to prosecution for war crimes. That makes his book less a serious discussion of interrogation policy than a literary defense of war criminals."
    • Rove Protects the Rear (Corn, Mother Jones)
      "Mother Jones has produced a timeline that lists the false Bush administration assertions. And to remind Rove—and book reviewers—here's a limited sampling of notable whoppers, reported in my books and elsewhere."
    • The revision thing: A history of the Iraq war, told entirely in lies (Sam Smith, Harper's Magazine)
      "Once again, we were defending both ourselves and the safety and survival of civilization itself. September 11 signaled the arrival of an entirely different era. We faced perils we had never thought about, perils we had never seen before. For decades, terrorists had waged war against this country. Now, under the leadership of President Bush, America would wage war against them. It was a struggle between good and it was a struggle between evil."
    • Obama advisers set to recommend military tribunals for alleged 9/11 plotters (Kornblut, Finn, WaPo)
      "President Obama's advisers are nearing a recommendation that Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, be prosecuted in a military tribunal, administration officials said, a step that would reverse Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.'s plan to try him in civilian court in New York City. "
  • Meta

  • Subscribe

“I don’t see your @** in my hometown”

Posted by Thomas Nephew on March 11th, 2009

Meanwhile, back in Iraq, things appear to be going swimmingly, if this video is any indication:

Since nothing to the contrary has surfaced since the video first appeared on YouTube in late January, I’ll assume it really is of recent vintage. Writing for “Foreign Policy,” Thomas Ricks mentions the video and declares earnestly that there’s a right way to do Iraq, and the wrong way, and that this is the wrong way gosh darn it: “everything I’ve seen about Iraqis tells me that publicly disparaging them is not the way to go.”

Well, sure; I don’t think that’s some sort of tribal peculiarity of Iraqis either. But it’s also possible there *is* no right way to “do” Iraq, and that’s what this officer is up against, assuming he cares. “Raise your hand if you’re in the Mahdi militia” is pretty much the definition of admitting you have no idea what’s going on with the people in front of you, you know you never will, you’ve given up pretending you will, and all that’s left is to make an Armed Forces Clueless Home Video about it.

I’m tempted to excerpt it at some length, but it really has to be heard to be believed.  This may be a particularly bad day, or bad assignment.  But it seems to me we’d best be out of there as quickly as possible.  And if it were me, I’d just keep going and get the rest of the “residual” force out of there on the same timetable.  I’m not sure Obama will have much choice.

=====
EDIT, 3/12: title changed to try to avoid the wrong kind of Google hits.

3 Responses to ““I don’t see your @** in my hometown””

  1. Thomas Nephew Says:

    What the heck — here’s some of what he says:

    “…you know why I’m pissed off? I come down here with my soldiers to try to train you, and you’re trying to f***ing kill Americans, you’re trying to kill your fellow f***ing Iraqis, cause you got no f***ing backbone. You want everything from me, you want weapons, and ammunition, you want fuel, and trucks…but you’re too f***ing p**sy to go 3 f***ing kilometers down the road and go get the people who’re tearing this f***ing town apart.

    You guys better figure out where your loyalties lie. Are you loyal to Iraq? Shia? Sunni? What is it? You want to fight for your country? Or are you better off having me die for your country because you’re too much of a f***ing woman to do it yourself.

    You love seeing Americans die for your f***ing country, you won’t die for it yourself.

    I don’t see your @** in my hometown.”

    He’s not really arguing with the Iraqis; it seems to me he’s arguing with himself about what if anything he’s accomplishing.

    ===
    (EDIT, 3/12: @**, as in title change.)

  2. Nell Says:

    We dial-up readers are deeply appreciative.

    The whole idea that we’re there “for” the Iraqis makes me throw up, one reason I didn’t care for Obama’s speech at Camp Lejeune. But brutal honesty would make it a little hard for everybody to feel good about themselves.

    The “pep talk” is the result of this giant clusterfvck of cognitive dissonance.

  3. Thomas Nephew Says:

    Yup. Re cognitive dissonance, the youtube comments and blog responses (via technorati) are interesting too. It’s like this is a video Rorschach test or that “young woman / old woman” picture — different people have radically different takes on it. The video title is one — “Lazy Iraqi Police Get Motivational Speech”, and a typical amen goes “Kick some lazy Iraqi ass!!! Instead of whining about how mean this guy is, someone needs to stand up and commend him for kicking ass and not being scared of his own shadow like the so called men he is speaking to.”

    Then there are responses like “the guy keeps going at them like “if you don’t die for your country, i won’t do it for you”, he just failed to remember between 400,000 to 600,000 Irakis already lost their lives since 2003, among which at least 100,000 because of “collateral damage” and “that wouldn’t motivate me at all, if i see some bitch ass non-iraqi coming to my country to insult me and tell me shit, i would be very piss[ed] off”.

    I guess that’s not surprising. This just feels like a particularly vivid demonstration of divisions about Iraq; it’s a kind of sociology/political science experiment or “controlled natural history observation.”

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>