newsrackblog.com

a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

  • Recent Comments

    • Thomas Nephew on Ladies and gentlemen: your infinitely cunning Democratic Party
    • Nell on Ladies and gentlemen: your infinitely cunning Democratic Party
    • Thomas Nephew on A city’s ‘city issue’ issue
    • Seth Grimes on A city’s ‘city issue’ issue
    • Joe Blunt on How’s that lesser evil thing working out?
    • Thomas Ray Worley on National Popular Vote vs. fixing the electoral college
    • Dan on County Council’s retreat loses respect — and Busboys
    • Thomas Nephew on From sundown towns to a midnight county
    • Bruce Godfrey on From sundown towns to a midnight county
    • Thomas Nephew on Were recalls the way to go?
    • ballgame on Were recalls the way to go?
    • Thomas Nephew on Were recalls the way to go?

  • Recent Trackbacks

  • Real News

  • RSS my delicious

    • In Congress, Dem and GOPer Working Together to Change the NDAA | Mother Jones
      "Smith and Amash's effort comes amid a bipartisan backlash against indefinite detention that has already produced legislation on the state level. Republican-dominated legislatures in Arizona, Maine, and Virginia have passed anti-NDAA legislation. Proponents of indefinite detention argue that Congress' 2001 authorization of the use of military force against Al Qaeda and the Taliban permits the indefinite detention without trial of American citizens, even those apprehended in the United States. But the Supreme Court has not definitively ruled on the issue. Opponents counter that indefinite detention of American citizens in the United States is unconstitutional."
    • Review & Outlook: The Tea Party's Inner ACLU - WSJ.com
      The Wall Street Journal has a conniption fit about conservative opposition to the NDAA: "The ACLU tea partiers may be well-intentioned but they are woefully uninformed about the war on the terror. Their efforts would undermine executive war-fighting authority and the legitimacy of a terrorist detention and military tribunal system that has been established over many Congresses, endorsed by two Presidents and confirmed by the Supreme Court. They should stick to shrinking the entitlement state."
    • Arizona Joins Virginia in the NDAA Exodus. Is Nullification the Next New Thing? (Cutting the Gordian Knot)
      "In less than a week’s time a second state has put a foot down making it clear that it will not cooperate with Federal Law which is blatantly unconstitutional. Yesterday Arizona became the second state to pass a nullification of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)."
    • How Obama Became a Civil Libertarian's Nightmare | | AlterNet
      “The major defining feature of the Obama administration on this issue is the eagerness with which it embraced the stunning evisceration of civil rights and liberties that was a hallmark of the Bush administration, and then deepened those outrageous programs,” said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, who is an attorney representing many Occupy protesters swept up in last fall’s mass arrests. “He has successfully counted on the acquiescent silence of the liberals.”
    • ‘I withdraw’: A talk with climate defeatist Paul Kingsnorth (Stephenson, Grist)
      I don’t think any “climate movement” is going to reverse the tide of history, for one reason: We are all climate change. It is not the evil “1%” destroying the planet. We are all of us part of that destruction. This is the great, conflicted, complex situation we find ourselves in. I am climate change. You are climate change. Our culture is climate change. And climate change itself is just the tip of a much bigger iceberg, if you’ll pardon the terrible but appropriate pun. If we were to wake up tomorrow to the news that climate change were a hoax or a huge mistake, we would still be living in a world in which extinction rates were between 100 and 1000 times natural levels and in which we have managed to destroy 25 percent of the world’s wildlife in the last four decades alone.
    • Chris Hedges: Someone You Love: Coming to a Gulag Near You - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig
      “You are unable to say that [such a book] consisting of political speech could not be captured under [NDAA section] 1021?” the judge asked. “We can’t say that,” Torrance answered. “Are you telling me that no U.S. citizen can be detained under 1021?” Forest asked. “That’s not a reasonable fear,” the government lawyer said. Advertisement “Say it’s reasonable to fear you will be unlucky [and face] detention, trial. What does ‘directly supported’ mean?” she asked. “We have not said anything about that …” Torrance answered. “What do you think it means?” the judge asked. “Give me an example that distinguishes between direct and indirect support. Give me a single example.” “We have not come to a position on that,” he said. “So assume you are a U.S. citizen trying not to run afoul of this law. What does it [the phrase] mean to you?” the judge said. “I couldn’t offer any specific language,” Torrance answered. “I don’t have a specific example.”
    • America brings the ‘war on terror’ home (Wolf, Daily Star)
      "(Judge) Forrest also repeatedly asked for assurances – at least five times – that the NDAA would not sweep up people like the plaintiffs: journalists engaged in journalism and citizens engaged in peaceful protest. Again, every time, the lawyers for Obama and Panetta said that they could not give her such assurances. [...] We now have it from the U.S. government lawyers’ own mouths: This law may put journalists at risk, or at least the lawyers explicitly refused to rule out that option for their client – and, as Forrest put it, they have “one very big client.”"
    • Obama’s evolution: Behind the failed ‘grand bargain’ on the debt (Wallsten/Montgomery/Wilson, WaPo)
      "That night, Obama prepared his party’s congressional leaders. He warned Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that he might return to the position under discussion the previous Sunday — that is, cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in exchange for just $800 billion in tax increases. [...] White House officials said this week that the offer is still on the table."
    • Not All Labor Leaders Happy With AFL-CIO’s Obama Endorsement (Elk, In These Times)
      “There's not a lot of choice here, that’s the sad part of this,” says Matt McKinnon, political and legislative director of the Machinists union (IAM), which is affiliated with AFL-CIO and endorsed the president earlier this year. “He’s been a disappointment in several areas, but he came through with some decent appointees.” The expected endorsement represents the reality that organized labor leaders still feel trapped in a two-party system, with a not-always labor-friendly Democratic Party on one side and a downright hostile Republican Party on the other.
    • Elections: What Are They Good For? (Swanson, War Is A Crime.org)
      Voting isn't everything. "I think Emma Goldman had a point in saying that if voting changed anything they would ban it. I think Howard Zinn had a point in saying that it doesn't matter who is sitting in the White House so much as who is doing the sitting in. The relentless ubiquitous question of how you can change the world if you refuse to engage in electoral politics strikes me as crazy. Women didn't vote themselves the right to vote. Workers didn't elect the eight hour day. India didn't vote the British out."
    • Part II Infiltration of Political Movements is the Norm, Not the Exception in the United States (Zeese, Occupy Washington, DC)
      "When the long history of political infiltration is reviewed, the Occupy Movement should be surprised if it is not infiltrated. Almost every movement in modern history has been infiltrated by police and others using many of the same tactics we are now seeing in Occupy. "
    • Critiques Of Libertarianism: A Non-Libertarian FAQ (Huben)
      "The purpose of this FAQ is not to attack libertarianism, but some of the more fallacious arguments within it. That done, libertarians can then reformulate or reject these arguments. This is also needed to help people place libertarianism and its arguments in context. It is very hard to find any literature about libertarianism that was NOT written by its advocates. This isolation from normal political discourse makes it difficult to evaluate libertarian claims without much more research or analysis than most of us have time for. Compare this to (for example) the extensive literature of socialism and communism written by ideologues, scholars, pundits, etc. on all sides. Libertarianism is scantily analyzed outside its own movement. Let's fix that."
    • UPDATED: Limbaugh's Misogynistic Attack On Georgetown Law Student Continues With Increased Vitriol (Media Matters for America)
      Always good to have a reference, this is it. "Rush Limbaugh is not backing down after widespread condemnation over his misogynistic attack on Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University Law School student who testified before Congress recently about the problems caused when women lack access to contraception. " Multiple clips for future show and tells.
    • America's Death Squads (Davies, PDA Community/ZCommunications)
      "Barack Obama has halted the macabre parade of hooded, shackled suspects in orange jumpsuits stumbling off American planes into the tropical sunshine at Guantanamo, but he has not done so by restoring the rule of law. Instead, to a great extent, he has replaced Bush’s policy with a global campaign to simply kill a wide range of people in cold blood: terrorism suspects, resistance fighters, and anyone else added to secret lists for secret reasons. From a uniquely American “exceptionalist” point of view, killing suspects instead of capturing them is a convenient way to avoid the embarrassment of sweeping up hundreds of mostly innocent people in an indiscriminate global dragnet and then not knowing what to do with them. The dead tell no tales. Public outrage is contained within the faraway countries where the killings take place and does not cause domestic political problems."
    • Corruption in Iraq: 'Your son is being tortured. He will die if you don't pay' (Abdul-Ahad, Guardian)
      Iraq ten years after: instead of one Saddam, many little ones. "Yassir was detained in 2007. For three years she heard nothing of him and assumed he was dead like his brothers. Then one day she took a phone call from an officer who said she could go to visit him if she paid a bribe. She borrowed the money from her neighbour and set off for the prison. "We waited until they brought him," she said. "His hands and legs were tied in metal chains like a criminal. I didn't know him from the torture. He wasn't my son, he was someone else.""

  • Subscribe

  • Meta

Blogged.com
«« prior: Clearly coercive moral clarity
next: Charges against Takoma Park’s... »»

We’re Number 5! We’re Number 5!

Posted by Thomas Nephew on January 16th, 2009


Top Ten List (photo link); click here for the list.
Originally uploaded by Thomas Nephew

The “Ideas for Change” contest / idea run-off / social networking experiment run by Change.org ended yesterday at 5 p.m. — and “Get FISA Right, repeal the PATRIOT Act, and restore our civil liberties” was among the top 10 vote-getters.  Our fifth place finish — woo-hoo! — earned a place in the listing to the right at a press conference today.  In addition, change.org pledges that

Over the next week we will be working with nonprofit sponsors for each idea, including 1Sky, Healthcare-NOW!, and The Peace Alliance, to craft national campaigns around each idea.

Change.org’s Ben Rattray said part of the idea will be to have activists document the unfolding of the campaign themselves, using “Flip” video cameras provided for the purpose.

I’ll allow myself another “w00t!” about this, since I was part of an interesting (and surprisingly intense) “Get FISA Right” vote-hunting operation masterminded by veteran social networker and FISA activist Jon Pincus: contacting facebook groups, sending personal emails, collecting endorsements, and the like.

All of that was helpful, no doubt, but probably the single most helpful things for us had to do with alliances with other groups — first and foremost, it seemed to me, the venerable Democrats.com site.  After a straw poll indicated strong support among “Get FISA Righters”, we and Democrats.com co-promoted the “Get FISA Right” and “Appoint a Special Prosecutor” ideas.  In the event, this alliance and similar ones with “DREAM” and GLBT marriage equality activists may well have kept the FISA reform/PATRIOT repeal vote total in the top 10.  Unfortunately, the “Special Prosecutor” idea fell just short, although it remains posted at the same page in a second tier of ideas garnering 2500 votes or more.

Having said all this, I freely acknowledge I don’t know exactly what it’s all worth; I think the main message it sends is that the FISA issue is still very much alive and kicking among the “netroots.” In other cases, though, the message was “there are way more of us than you dreamed of,” for example in the case of a strongly supported call to “Save Small Business From the CPSIA,” the heartfelt wish of thousands of toy makers and other craftspeople blindsided by new federal product testing requirements after the Chinese tainted toy scandal of a year ago.

Change.org press conference announcing
Change.org press conference, National Press Club
in downtown DC, 1/16/09. The press conference
was held to announce the top 10 vote getters in
 the “Ideas for Change” event.
Originally uploaded by Thomas Nephew

In his introductory remarks, founder Ben Rattray hit many of the right notes in emphasizing how new groups can come together online at sites like change.org, and be empowered to find a voice and their own strength in numbers.  Somewhat oddly, the event then featured a high-powered panel (Joe Trippi of Howard Dean fame; Chris Hughes the myBarackObama.com phenom) talking at the crowd, rather than highlighting any of the social networking activists who had attracted the “656,991 votes for 7,847 ideas,” or asking what worked and what didn’t.

Nor was much time wasted on discussing the various  so-called “niche” ideas — to use the somewhat unfortunate term Rattray repeated a few times. There’s nothing really “niche” about any of the top ten ideas: sustainable economy … drug policy … small business survival … a secretary and department of peace …  health care … higher education for the children of immigrants … marriage equality … civil liberties … more health care … green, non-carbon-based energy grid.

To be sure, I had to leave before the question and answer period, and meanwhile Trippi, Hughes, and the other panelists had plenty of the right experience and plenty of worthwhile things to say.  But the event seemed to illustrate how the medium of social networking is sometimes a little more top-down than advertised, and how it can sometimes seem more important to its practitioners than the messages it’s being used to convey and amplify.

But those are quibbles.  It was good to prove civil liberties, privacy rights, and rule of law have a lot of committed supporters; it was educational to see what brought out the greatest numbers and best organizing elsewhere, and it was great of change.org to provide a place for all of that to happen.  Thanks, very much.

=====
UPDATE, 1/17: Be sure to visit a similar effort at the Obama transition team’s “change.gov” web site: Get FISA Right, repeal the PATRIOT Act and restore our civil liberties.  The deadline for voting is Sunday, January 18, at 6 pm.

Category: Post. Tags: , , . Thread RSS, Comment, Trackback. Print This Print This

11 Responses to “We’re Number 5! We’re Number 5!”

  1. jon Says:
    January 18th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Great post, Thomas, very insightful observations. Like I said in email to the group, I wish every one of us could have been there, and I’m glad at least one of us was! Did you have a chance to meet any people supporting other ideas?

    And yeah, despite its billing, this wasn’t actually an event about the Ideas for Change. I had asked Ben whether we could use it to launch our video “President Obama, please get FISA Right” - which is all of 25 seconds long - but the agenda was already set. Disappointing. I agree that Trippi, Hughes, Jose Antonio Vargas et al have plenty of interesting things to say, but they have plenty of other places to say it. It’s something to learn from moving forward.

    Excellent point about how democratizing technologizes like social computing and social media can also be used in a top-down and power-reinforcing way. In fact I think that’s the natural tendency: these systems are generally created by relatively-privileged people with others like themselves in mind (e.g. Facebook for Harvard undergraduates). Also, from a gender HCI perspective, the software engineers and business people are typically primarily male and analytic-thinking and this gets embedded in the software and systems we use. etc. etc.

    Still, deeper understanding of the tools can allow us to use them more effectively. This is something where all the Ideas for Change — not just the top 10 — have a shared interest so it’s certainly one of the most leveraged places to start …

  2. jon Says:
    January 18th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    Also a belated response on the help we got from our allies.

    I wasn’t tracking precisely, but … Bob and Democrats.com help was huge and on Tuesday (as our voting was going on) and the last few hours Thursday our numbers largely paralleled his: the final surge that carried him to #11 also carried us to #5. And on Wednesday (or maybe early Thursday morning, can’t remember) I remember noticing our numbers were rising in parallel with DREAM Activists, which probably reflected us reaching a largely-new audience. LGBTQ and peace activists impact was harder to single out so I’m not sure … and once again these are largely-new audiences.

    In the end we made it into the top 5 by only 5 votes, so it was the combined contribution of each of these allies put us over the top.

    Thanks!

  3. Nell Says:
    January 18th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    Congratulations!

    ‘Niche’ ideas: like prosecution for torture, eh? Hm.

    Well, I’m still in a mellow state after crying my eyes out in several spots during the ‘We Are One’ concert. Broke down completely when Pete Seeger led the crowd in the ‘niche’ verses to ‘This Land is Your Land’ right after Obama’s speech… ;>

    Free on HBO at 7:00 if you have digital cable.

  4. Time to celebrate! (and Ideas for Change update) « Get FISA Right Says:
    January 19th, 2009 at 12:13 am

    [...] change.org’s press event on Friday featured some great speakers and got some nice press, for example Diego Graglia’s Immigrant Students, DREAM Act Supporters Hoping Obama Will Take Up Their Cause on Feet in 2 worlds, Nancy Scola’s Ideas for Change Settles on a top 10 on techPresident (which has the vote totals for the top ten finishers), and Prerna’s Undocumented Students Raise Voices Online for DREAM Act in New American Media (a great description of how our allies the DREAM Activists approached the competition).  Get FISA Right’s Thomas Nephew was there in-person and discussed it on newsrackblock.com in We’re Number 5!  We’re Number 5! [...]

  5. Thomas Nephew Says:
    January 19th, 2009 at 1:44 am

    Thanks Jon and Nell! (Had to google gender HCI, and learned HCI stands for human-computer interaction, and that “gender HCI” “focuses on the design and evaluation of interactive systems for humans, with emphasis on differences in how males and females interact with computers.”)

    Re meeting others: I got a business card from the “Department of Peace” supporter sitting next to me, which is buried in my satchel somewhere now. But I arrived with minutes to go before the press conference part started (stupid Metro), and had to leave early (stupid work :)). Everybody else’s job appeared to be “be at a press conference from 9am-11am.” So I didn’t get to do much networking/meeting people.

    I suppose I’m coming around to a more social-networky outlook as I’m exposed to what can be done with it. Plus in some ways it’s not that new: I think there’s an element to it, at the basic level, that’s kind of like yard signs: “this is what I think” facebook displays, that often bring in friends and acquaintances: “Huh. Why does he think that? I’ll check it out.” I know that around here, he/she who wins the yard sign race often wins the election. There’s a chicken/egg aspect to that, but yard signs definitely make it easier to imagine supporting the candidate. Online “yard signs” have the added benefit that these yard signs are clickable, and can lead straight to organizations and/or knowledge about/of issues.

    Missed the concert, Nell, but you make me think I shouldn’t have. Yes, the “niche” stuff bothered me a bit. It could seem like he didn’t “get” his own brainchild. The groups that rise to the top of this kind of thing may well have geographically and/or demographically diffuse, diverse support bases — but that makes it all the more remarkable that they can attract the level of support they do. It’s not “niche” so much as “not being listened to, yet, but quite sure they’re right, and quite sure there are more like them” that seems to sum up the group’s memberships to me. Assuming they are right and keep growing, “niche” is one of the last available ways to ignore them before they sweep over, around, and past you.

    Note to both: comments are displayed in the order received, but comments are also held for moderation for new commenters. Sorry about the delay, Jon.

  6. Congratulations, President Obama. Please … get FISA right. « Get FISA Right Says:
    January 19th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    [...] cool is that?  All the more so because our top-five finish in change.org’s Ideas for Change in America (details TBD, latest update here), which means [...]

  7. What would we like to ask President Obama? « Get FISA Right Says:
    March 17th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    [...] is the kind of stuff that Get FISA Right has done well in the past, for example finishing #5 in change.org’s Ideas for Change in America.  As well as resuming our dialog with President Obama, If we can get somebody to ask a [...]

  8. Ideas for Change 2010: how you can help! « Get FISA Right Says:
    February 10th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    [...] Nephew’s We’re Number 5! We’re Number 5! and Time to celebrate! recount Get FISA Right’s excellent performance in last year’s [...]

  9. Get FISA Right Update & Retrospective « Get FISA Right Says:
    October 19th, 2010 at 8:11 pm

    [...] to conceive and fund 30 second TV ads through SaysMe.TV, taking part in the Change.org/MySpace Ideas for Change, and making sure that our language was adopted as part of the Netroots [...]

  10. Quora Says:
    February 1st, 2011 at 12:06 am

    Are social networks the new platforms for social activism?…

    Excellent points. Totally agreed on the missing pieces today. One thing I’d say though is that despite existing social networks limitations, they can be effective ways of sending a message to legislators (a Get FISA Right act.ly petition got a Senat…

  11. Liminal states :: Patriot Act renewal: Time to make some noise. Fortunately, there’s an app for that! Says:
    February 6th, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    [...] of you who worked with us on my.barackobama.com in summer 2008 or in change.org’s Ideas for Change in America in early 2009 already know the drill. The basic strategy comes down to “make it easy for [...]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

«« prior: Clearly coercive moral clarity
next: Charges against Takoma Park’s... »»