newsrackblog.com

a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

  • Recent Comments

    • Thomas Nephew on Lost no more: the story of the first Memorial Day
    • Thomas Nephew on Lost no more: the story of the first Memorial Day
    • Nell on Lost no more: the story of the first Memorial Day
    • Nell on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing
    • Thomas Nephew on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing
    • Nell on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing
    • Nell on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing
    • Nell on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing
    • Nell on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing
    • Thomas Nephew on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing
    • Nell on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing
    • Thomas Nephew on Actively embedded, passively acquiescing

  • Recent Trackbacks

    • Get FISA Right: Ideas for Change 2010: how you can help!
    • Threads: over the territory of Nagorno-Karabagh. Although some elements in the Armenian diaspora expressed...
    • Talk Islam: Aziz suggested I notify TI of a series o…
    • Energy 2.0: CAFE oh, yay?
    • Mick Arran: The Troy Davis Conundrum (Updated)
    • Mick Arran: The Troy Davis Conundrum

  • Real News

  • RSS my delicious

    • Voting Behind Bars (Greenhouse, NYTimes)
      "Given the implications of the case, the Supreme Court’s order has received surprisingly little attention. Forty-eight states, all except Maine and Vermont, deny convicted felons the right to vote, a modern version of the old concept of “civil death” for those convicted of serious crimes. In some states, as in Massachusetts, the ban lasts for the duration of the prison sentence. More often, it extends for years longer, through the parole period, as in New York, where in 2006 the federal appeals court rejected a challenge over the dissent of four judges, including Sonia Sotomayor."
    • Obama agencies invoking secrecy provision more often than under Bush (Byrne, Raw Story, March 2010)
      "One year later, Obama's requests for transparency have apparently gone unheeded. In fact a provision in the Freedom of Information Act law that allows the government to hide records that detail its internal decision-making has been invoked by Obama agencies more often in the past year than during the final year of President George W. Bush."
    • A political filter for info requests (Bridis, AP, 7/21)
      "For at least a year, the Homeland Security Department detoured hundreds of requests for federal records to senior political advisers for highly unusual scrutiny, probing for information about the requesters and delaying disclosures deemed too politically sensitive, according to nearly 1,000 pages of internal e-mails obtained by The Associated Press."
    • More on the Latest DOJ Whitewash (Horton, Harper's Magazine)
      "Now information has emerged that seriously undermines the reputation of former Connecticut U.S. Attorney Nora Dannehy, tapped by former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey to handle the probe. In a report prepared by the Justice Integrity Project, Harvard University’s Nieman Watchdog reports: Four days before Nora Dannehy was appointed to investigate the Bush Administration’s U.S. attorney firing scandal, a team of lawyers she led was found to have illegally suppressed evidence in a major political corruption case."
    • Against Despair (Tomasky, Democracy, Summer 2010)
      "It’s one thing to be disappointed in policy outcomes, or even angry about them. But more and more it seems that we are in an age of liberal despair–as reflex and first instinct, as motif and explanation, even, it sometimes seems to me, as fashion. Criticism of legislation and proposals is always proper and necessary, as is the application of whatever pressure people can apply to try to produce more progressive outcomes. But I’ve read and heard many critiques that then race right past that into outright desolation."
    • Should Israel Bomb Iran? (Reuel Marc Gerecht, The Weekly Standard)
      Neocon wet dream: "Although dangerous for Israel, a preventive strike remains the most effective answer to the possibility of Khamenei and the Revolutionary Guards having nuclear weapons. Provided the Israeli air force is capable of executing it, and assuming no U.S. military action, an Israeli bombardment remains the only conceivable means of derailing or seriously delaying Iran’s nuclear program and—equally important—traumatizing Tehran." This despite admissions elsewhere that prospects of 'success' is not guaranteed (to put it mildly). If this is how they think in Israel, I can only hope the Israeli air force tells its civilian leaders the thing isn't doable.
    • Unending Divisions of the Bosnian War (Estrin, NYTimes, 7/12)
      "This month marks the 15th anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre, when more than 7,000 Muslim men and boys were rounded up and executed by Bosnian Serb forces. On June 10, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, a U.N. court of law at the Hague, convicted two Bosnian Serb security officers of genocide and sentenced them to life in prison for their roles at Srebrenica."
    • The Fall and Rise of Rand Paul: Critical Eye(J.Miles, Details)
      "Rand Paul and I are trying to remember why Harlan, Kentucky, might be famous." Wow, Rand Paul is even stupider than I thought. Plus wonderful quotes on the Montcoal disaster and mountaintop removal. If Kentucky elects this nitwit to the Senate they deserve him -- problem is, the rest of us don't.
    • Drivers on Prescription Drugs Are Hard to Convict (Goodnough, Zezima, NYTimes)
      "Some states have made it illegal to drive with any detectable level of prohibited drugs in the blood. But setting any kind of limit for prescription medications is far more complicated, partly because the complex chemistry of drugs makes their effects more difficult to predict than alcohol’s. And determining whether a driver took drugs soon before getting on the road can be tricky, since some linger in the body for days or weeks."
    • The Right Reason for Saving Social Security (Rivlin, Brookings Institution)
      "The right reason for saving Social Security is to reassure all Americans that this hugely successful program is solidly funded and will be there for the millions who depend on it when they need it. That such action will make a modest contribution to reducing long run deficits is a serendipitous by-product, not the central motivation. The reason for acting now rather than later is simply that the sooner we act the less drastic adjustments we have to make."
    • Which Side Are You On? Alice Rivlin and the Wall Street Bailout King, or Social Security? (Eskow, HuffPo)
      "There's a battle going on between those who are defending Social Security - that is to say, the "good guys" - and those like economist Alice Rivlin and Wall Street banker/giveaway king Neel Kashkari, who would cut it. The attackers pretend to see nuances that don't exist, slanting their arguments to make benefits reductions seem inevitable and even humane."
    • Felon Voting Rights and Democracy (Gould, openDemocracy)
      "Although the judicial branch of government at both the state and national levels commonly supports felon voting rights, legislators, who for the most part do not support felon voting rights, have more influence than judges on the everyday ramifications of felon disenfranchisement. To overturn felon disenfranchisement, then, a massive education effort is needed, targeted at the American public. Americans should be made to reflect on the practical consequences of felon disenfranchisement as well as on its implications for democratic governance."
    • Positive Punishment (Henley, "")Unqualified Offerings
      "Across a whole range of problems there’s a class of responses I’ll dub the “low road” and another class I’ll call the “high road.” Examples of the former include war, torture, sanctions and blockades, imprisonment, aversive conditioning of all types (spanking; “dominance”-based animal training). Examples of the latter include diplomacy, rapport-building, civil disobedience, the free exchange of goods and ideas, decriminalization and rehabilitation, positive conditioning (of humans and animals). [...] ...what we see over and over again is that we judge high-road approaches as failures unless they produce nigh-instant and complete favorable results, while we show nearly infinite patience for journeys down the low road."
    • What Obama Should Have Said to BP (Pfaff, The New York Review of Books)
      “I am instructing that all BP assets within the United States, or in its surrounding waters, including funds immediately at its disposal, and all other BP funds accessible to the United States government, be temporarily seized and sequestered so as to prevent the transfer of any funds or assets of this company outside United States jurisdiction and access. The disposition of those assets will eventually be determined by the courts or by a new independent federal agency, with priority given to the reimbursement of persons and property-holders victimized by this catastrophe, and the redressment of damage or destruction to public assets and municipal, state, and national interests for which the former British Petroleum corporation is deemed by the courts, or by the independent agency, to have been responsible.”
    • The Photo That Brought AIDS Home - Photo Gallery - LIFE
      "In November, 1990, LIFE magazine published a photograph of a young man, David Kirby -- his body wasted by AIDS, his gaze locked on something beyond this world -- surrounded by anguished family members as he took his last breaths. The haunting image of Kirby's passing (above), taken by a journalism grad student named Therese Frare, became the one photograph most identified with the HIV/AIDS epidemic that, by then, had seen as many as 12 million people infected."

  • Subscribe

  • Meta

Blogged.com
«« prior: Clearly coercive moral clarity
next: Charges against Takoma Park’s... »»

We’re Number 5! We’re Number 5!

Posted by Thomas Nephew on January 16th, 2009


Top Ten List (photo link); click here for the list.
Originally uploaded by Thomas Nephew

The “Ideas for Change” contest / idea run-off / social networking experiment run by Change.org ended yesterday at 5 p.m. — and “Get FISA Right, repeal the PATRIOT Act, and restore our civil liberties” was among the top 10 vote-getters.  Our fifth place finish — woo-hoo! — earned a place in the listing to the right at a press conference today.  In addition, change.org pledges that

Over the next week we will be working with nonprofit sponsors for each idea, including 1Sky, Healthcare-NOW!, and The Peace Alliance, to craft national campaigns around each idea.

Change.org’s Ben Rattray said part of the idea will be to have activists document the unfolding of the campaign themselves, using “Flip” video cameras provided for the purpose.

I’ll allow myself another “w00t!” about this, since I was part of an interesting (and surprisingly intense) “Get FISA Right” vote-hunting operation masterminded by veteran social networker and FISA activist Jon Pincus: contacting facebook groups, sending personal emails, collecting endorsements, and the like.

All of that was helpful, no doubt, but probably the single most helpful things for us had to do with alliances with other groups — first and foremost, it seemed to me, the venerable Democrats.com site.  After a straw poll indicated strong support among “Get FISA Righters”, we and Democrats.com co-promoted the “Get FISA Right” and “Appoint a Special Prosecutor” ideas.  In the event, this alliance and similar ones with “DREAM” and GLBT marriage equality activists may well have kept the FISA reform/PATRIOT repeal vote total in the top 10.  Unfortunately, the “Special Prosecutor” idea fell just short, although it remains posted at the same page in a second tier of ideas garnering 2500 votes or more.

Having said all this, I freely acknowledge I don’t know exactly what it’s all worth; I think the main message it sends is that the FISA issue is still very much alive and kicking among the “netroots.” In other cases, though, the message was “there are way more of us than you dreamed of,” for example in the case of a strongly supported call to “Save Small Business From the CPSIA,” the heartfelt wish of thousands of toy makers and other craftspeople blindsided by new federal product testing requirements after the Chinese tainted toy scandal of a year ago.

Change.org press conference announcing
Change.org press conference, National Press Club
in downtown DC, 1/16/09. The press conference
was held to announce the top 10 vote getters in
 the “Ideas for Change” event.
Originally uploaded by Thomas Nephew

In his introductory remarks, founder Ben Rattray hit many of the right notes in emphasizing how new groups can come together online at sites like change.org, and be empowered to find a voice and their own strength in numbers.  Somewhat oddly, the event then featured a high-powered panel (Joe Trippi of Howard Dean fame; Chris Hughes the myBarackObama.com phenom) talking at the crowd, rather than highlighting any of the social networking activists who had attracted the “656,991 votes for 7,847 ideas,” or asking what worked and what didn’t.

Nor was much time wasted on discussing the various  so-called “niche” ideas — to use the somewhat unfortunate term Rattray repeated a few times. There’s nothing really “niche” about any of the top ten ideas: sustainable economy … drug policy … small business survival … a secretary and department of peace …  health care … higher education for the children of immigrants … marriage equality … civil liberties … more health care … green, non-carbon-based energy grid.

To be sure, I had to leave before the question and answer period, and meanwhile Trippi, Hughes, and the other panelists had plenty of the right experience and plenty of worthwhile things to say.  But the event seemed to illustrate how the medium of social networking is sometimes a little more top-down than advertised, and how it can sometimes seem more important to its practitioners than the messages it’s being used to convey and amplify.

But those are quibbles.  It was good to prove civil liberties, privacy rights, and rule of law have a lot of committed supporters; it was educational to see what brought out the greatest numbers and best organizing elsewhere, and it was great of change.org to provide a place for all of that to happen.  Thanks, very much.

=====
UPDATE, 1/17: Be sure to visit a similar effort at the Obama transition team’s “change.gov” web site: Get FISA Right, repeal the PATRIOT Act and restore our civil liberties.  The deadline for voting is Sunday, January 18, at 6 pm.

Category: Post. Tags: , , . Thread RSS, Comment, Trackback. Print This Print This

8 Responses to “We’re Number 5! We’re Number 5!”

  1. jon Says:
    January 18th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Great post, Thomas, very insightful observations. Like I said in email to the group, I wish every one of us could have been there, and I’m glad at least one of us was! Did you have a chance to meet any people supporting other ideas?

    And yeah, despite its billing, this wasn’t actually an event about the Ideas for Change. I had asked Ben whether we could use it to launch our video “President Obama, please get FISA Right” - which is all of 25 seconds long - but the agenda was already set. Disappointing. I agree that Trippi, Hughes, Jose Antonio Vargas et al have plenty of interesting things to say, but they have plenty of other places to say it. It’s something to learn from moving forward.

    Excellent point about how democratizing technologizes like social computing and social media can also be used in a top-down and power-reinforcing way. In fact I think that’s the natural tendency: these systems are generally created by relatively-privileged people with others like themselves in mind (e.g. Facebook for Harvard undergraduates). Also, from a gender HCI perspective, the software engineers and business people are typically primarily male and analytic-thinking and this gets embedded in the software and systems we use. etc. etc.

    Still, deeper understanding of the tools can allow us to use them more effectively. This is something where all the Ideas for Change — not just the top 10 — have a shared interest so it’s certainly one of the most leveraged places to start …

  2. jon Says:
    January 18th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    Also a belated response on the help we got from our allies.

    I wasn’t tracking precisely, but … Bob and Democrats.com help was huge and on Tuesday (as our voting was going on) and the last few hours Thursday our numbers largely paralleled his: the final surge that carried him to #11 also carried us to #5. And on Wednesday (or maybe early Thursday morning, can’t remember) I remember noticing our numbers were rising in parallel with DREAM Activists, which probably reflected us reaching a largely-new audience. LGBTQ and peace activists impact was harder to single out so I’m not sure … and once again these are largely-new audiences.

    In the end we made it into the top 5 by only 5 votes, so it was the combined contribution of each of these allies put us over the top.

    Thanks!

  3. Nell Says:
    January 18th, 2009 at 7:49 pm

    Congratulations!

    ‘Niche’ ideas: like prosecution for torture, eh? Hm.

    Well, I’m still in a mellow state after crying my eyes out in several spots during the ‘We Are One’ concert. Broke down completely when Pete Seeger led the crowd in the ‘niche’ verses to ‘This Land is Your Land’ right after Obama’s speech… ;>

    Free on HBO at 7:00 if you have digital cable.

  4. Time to celebrate! (and Ideas for Change update) « Get FISA Right Says:
    January 19th, 2009 at 12:13 am

    [...] change.org’s press event on Friday featured some great speakers and got some nice press, for example Diego Graglia’s Immigrant Students, DREAM Act Supporters Hoping Obama Will Take Up Their Cause on Feet in 2 worlds, Nancy Scola’s Ideas for Change Settles on a top 10 on techPresident (which has the vote totals for the top ten finishers), and Prerna’s Undocumented Students Raise Voices Online for DREAM Act in New American Media (a great description of how our allies the DREAM Activists approached the competition).  Get FISA Right’s Thomas Nephew was there in-person and discussed it on newsrackblock.com in We’re Number 5!  We’re Number 5! [...]

  5. Thomas Nephew Says:
    January 19th, 2009 at 1:44 am

    Thanks Jon and Nell! (Had to google gender HCI, and learned HCI stands for human-computer interaction, and that “gender HCI” “focuses on the design and evaluation of interactive systems for humans, with emphasis on differences in how males and females interact with computers.”)

    Re meeting others: I got a business card from the “Department of Peace” supporter sitting next to me, which is buried in my satchel somewhere now. But I arrived with minutes to go before the press conference part started (stupid Metro), and had to leave early (stupid work :)). Everybody else’s job appeared to be “be at a press conference from 9am-11am.” So I didn’t get to do much networking/meeting people.

    I suppose I’m coming around to a more social-networky outlook as I’m exposed to what can be done with it. Plus in some ways it’s not that new: I think there’s an element to it, at the basic level, that’s kind of like yard signs: “this is what I think” facebook displays, that often bring in friends and acquaintances: “Huh. Why does he think that? I’ll check it out.” I know that around here, he/she who wins the yard sign race often wins the election. There’s a chicken/egg aspect to that, but yard signs definitely make it easier to imagine supporting the candidate. Online “yard signs” have the added benefit that these yard signs are clickable, and can lead straight to organizations and/or knowledge about/of issues.

    Missed the concert, Nell, but you make me think I shouldn’t have. Yes, the “niche” stuff bothered me a bit. It could seem like he didn’t “get” his own brainchild. The groups that rise to the top of this kind of thing may well have geographically and/or demographically diffuse, diverse support bases — but that makes it all the more remarkable that they can attract the level of support they do. It’s not “niche” so much as “not being listened to, yet, but quite sure they’re right, and quite sure there are more like them” that seems to sum up the group’s memberships to me. Assuming they are right and keep growing, “niche” is one of the last available ways to ignore them before they sweep over, around, and past you.

    Note to both: comments are displayed in the order received, but comments are also held for moderation for new commenters. Sorry about the delay, Jon.

  6. Congratulations, President Obama. Please … get FISA right. « Get FISA Right Says:
    January 19th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    [...] cool is that?  All the more so because our top-five finish in change.org’s Ideas for Change in America (details TBD, latest update here), which means [...]

  7. What would we like to ask President Obama? « Get FISA Right Says:
    March 17th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    [...] is the kind of stuff that Get FISA Right has done well in the past, for example finishing #5 in change.org’s Ideas for Change in America.  As well as resuming our dialog with President Obama, If we can get somebody to ask a [...]

  8. Ideas for Change 2010: how you can help! « Get FISA Right Says:
    February 10th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    [...] Nephew’s We’re Number 5! We’re Number 5! and Time to celebrate! recount Get FISA Right’s excellent performance in last year’s [...]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

«« prior: Clearly coercive moral clarity
next: Charges against Takoma Park’s... »»