<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Van Hollen/Clark &#8220;mail in debate&#8221; at Progressive Neighbors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newsrackblog.com/2008/10/30/a-van-hollenclark-mail-in-debate-at-progressive-neighbors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newsrackblog.com/2008/10/30/a-van-hollenclark-mail-in-debate-at-progressive-neighbors/</link>
	<description>a citizen's journal by Thomas Nephew</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: newsrackblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Van Hollen: &#8220;public option is essential&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://newsrackblog.com/2008/10/30/a-van-hollenclark-mail-in-debate-at-progressive-neighbors/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>newsrackblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Van Hollen: &#8220;public option is essential&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrackblog.com/?p=2505#comment-5984</guid>
		<description>[...] emphasis &#8212; at least at this point &#8212; on the public option was welcome news to me.  Last year during the election he actually went further, endorsing a &#8220;single payer,&#8221; Medicare for all reform, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] emphasis &#8212; at least at this point &#8212; on the public option was welcome news to me.  Last year during the election he actually went further, endorsing a &#8220;single payer,&#8221; Medicare for all reform, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newsrackblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The greening of Van Hollen</title>
		<link>http://newsrackblog.com/2008/10/30/a-van-hollenclark-mail-in-debate-at-progressive-neighbors/#comment-5559</link>
		<dc:creator>newsrackblog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The greening of Van Hollen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsrackblog.com/?p=2505#comment-5559</guid>
		<description>[...] group, Progressive Neighbors. In a very surprising development (covered on this site), Clark tied with Van Hollen after a kind of &#8220;mail-in debate&#8221; &#8212; the only debate of any kind between the two candidates in the campaign. Clark had parried [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] group, Progressive Neighbors. In a very surprising development (covered on this site), Clark tied with Van Hollen after a kind of &#8220;mail-in debate&#8221; &#8212; the only debate of any kind between the two candidates in the campaign. Clark had parried [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

