newsrackblog.com

a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

  • Recent Comments

    • Thomas Nephew on Ladies and gentlemen: your infinitely cunning Democratic Party
    • Nell on Ladies and gentlemen: your infinitely cunning Democratic Party
    • Thomas Nephew on A city’s ‘city issue’ issue
    • Seth Grimes on A city’s ‘city issue’ issue
    • Joe Blunt on How’s that lesser evil thing working out?
    • Thomas Ray Worley on National Popular Vote vs. fixing the electoral college
    • Dan on County Council’s retreat loses respect — and Busboys
    • Thomas Nephew on From sundown towns to a midnight county
    • Bruce Godfrey on From sundown towns to a midnight county
    • Thomas Nephew on Were recalls the way to go?
    • ballgame on Were recalls the way to go?
    • Thomas Nephew on Were recalls the way to go?
  • Recent Trackbacks

  • Real News

  • RSS my delicious

    • In Congress, Dem and GOPer Working Together to Change the NDAA | Mother Jones
      "Smith and Amash's effort comes amid a bipartisan backlash against indefinite detention that has already produced legislation on the state level. Republican-dominated legislatures in Arizona, Maine, and Virginia have passed anti-NDAA legislation. Proponents of indefinite detention argue that Congress' 2001 authorization of the use of military force against Al Qaeda and the Taliban permits the indefinite detention without trial of American citizens, even those apprehended in the United States. But the Supreme Court has not definitively ruled on the issue. Opponents counter that indefinite detention of American citizens in the United States is unconstitutional."
    • Review & Outlook: The Tea Party's Inner ACLU - WSJ.com
      The Wall Street Journal has a conniption fit about conservative opposition to the NDAA: "The ACLU tea partiers may be well-intentioned but they are woefully uninformed about the war on the terror. Their efforts would undermine executive war-fighting authority and the legitimacy of a terrorist detention and military tribunal system that has been established over many Congresses, endorsed by two Presidents and confirmed by the Supreme Court. They should stick to shrinking the entitlement state."
    • Arizona Joins Virginia in the NDAA Exodus. Is Nullification the Next New Thing? (Cutting the Gordian Knot)
      "In less than a week’s time a second state has put a foot down making it clear that it will not cooperate with Federal Law which is blatantly unconstitutional. Yesterday Arizona became the second state to pass a nullification of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)."
    • How Obama Became a Civil Libertarian's Nightmare | | AlterNet
      “The major defining feature of the Obama administration on this issue is the eagerness with which it embraced the stunning evisceration of civil rights and liberties that was a hallmark of the Bush administration, and then deepened those outrageous programs,” said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, who is an attorney representing many Occupy protesters swept up in last fall’s mass arrests. “He has successfully counted on the acquiescent silence of the liberals.”
    • ‘I withdraw’: A talk with climate defeatist Paul Kingsnorth (Stephenson, Grist)
      I don’t think any “climate movement” is going to reverse the tide of history, for one reason: We are all climate change. It is not the evil “1%” destroying the planet. We are all of us part of that destruction. This is the great, conflicted, complex situation we find ourselves in. I am climate change. You are climate change. Our culture is climate change. And climate change itself is just the tip of a much bigger iceberg, if you’ll pardon the terrible but appropriate pun. If we were to wake up tomorrow to the news that climate change were a hoax or a huge mistake, we would still be living in a world in which extinction rates were between 100 and 1000 times natural levels and in which we have managed to destroy 25 percent of the world’s wildlife in the last four decades alone.
    • Chris Hedges: Someone You Love: Coming to a Gulag Near You - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig
      “You are unable to say that [such a book] consisting of political speech could not be captured under [NDAA section] 1021?” the judge asked. “We can’t say that,” Torrance answered. “Are you telling me that no U.S. citizen can be detained under 1021?” Forest asked. “That’s not a reasonable fear,” the government lawyer said. Advertisement “Say it’s reasonable to fear you will be unlucky [and face] detention, trial. What does ‘directly supported’ mean?” she asked. “We have not said anything about that …” Torrance answered. “What do you think it means?” the judge asked. “Give me an example that distinguishes between direct and indirect support. Give me a single example.” “We have not come to a position on that,” he said. “So assume you are a U.S. citizen trying not to run afoul of this law. What does it [the phrase] mean to you?” the judge said. “I couldn’t offer any specific language,” Torrance answered. “I don’t have a specific example.”
    • America brings the ‘war on terror’ home (Wolf, Daily Star)
      "(Judge) Forrest also repeatedly asked for assurances – at least five times – that the NDAA would not sweep up people like the plaintiffs: journalists engaged in journalism and citizens engaged in peaceful protest. Again, every time, the lawyers for Obama and Panetta said that they could not give her such assurances. [...] We now have it from the U.S. government lawyers’ own mouths: This law may put journalists at risk, or at least the lawyers explicitly refused to rule out that option for their client – and, as Forrest put it, they have “one very big client.”"
    • Obama’s evolution: Behind the failed ‘grand bargain’ on the debt (Wallsten/Montgomery/Wilson, WaPo)
      "That night, Obama prepared his party’s congressional leaders. He warned Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that he might return to the position under discussion the previous Sunday — that is, cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in exchange for just $800 billion in tax increases. [...] White House officials said this week that the offer is still on the table."
    • Not All Labor Leaders Happy With AFL-CIO’s Obama Endorsement (Elk, In These Times)
      “There's not a lot of choice here, that’s the sad part of this,” says Matt McKinnon, political and legislative director of the Machinists union (IAM), which is affiliated with AFL-CIO and endorsed the president earlier this year. “He’s been a disappointment in several areas, but he came through with some decent appointees.” The expected endorsement represents the reality that organized labor leaders still feel trapped in a two-party system, with a not-always labor-friendly Democratic Party on one side and a downright hostile Republican Party on the other.
    • Elections: What Are They Good For? (Swanson, War Is A Crime.org)
      Voting isn't everything. "I think Emma Goldman had a point in saying that if voting changed anything they would ban it. I think Howard Zinn had a point in saying that it doesn't matter who is sitting in the White House so much as who is doing the sitting in. The relentless ubiquitous question of how you can change the world if you refuse to engage in electoral politics strikes me as crazy. Women didn't vote themselves the right to vote. Workers didn't elect the eight hour day. India didn't vote the British out."
    • Part II Infiltration of Political Movements is the Norm, Not the Exception in the United States (Zeese, Occupy Washington, DC)
      "When the long history of political infiltration is reviewed, the Occupy Movement should be surprised if it is not infiltrated. Almost every movement in modern history has been infiltrated by police and others using many of the same tactics we are now seeing in Occupy. "
    • Critiques Of Libertarianism: A Non-Libertarian FAQ (Huben)
      "The purpose of this FAQ is not to attack libertarianism, but some of the more fallacious arguments within it. That done, libertarians can then reformulate or reject these arguments. This is also needed to help people place libertarianism and its arguments in context. It is very hard to find any literature about libertarianism that was NOT written by its advocates. This isolation from normal political discourse makes it difficult to evaluate libertarian claims without much more research or analysis than most of us have time for. Compare this to (for example) the extensive literature of socialism and communism written by ideologues, scholars, pundits, etc. on all sides. Libertarianism is scantily analyzed outside its own movement. Let's fix that."
    • UPDATED: Limbaugh's Misogynistic Attack On Georgetown Law Student Continues With Increased Vitriol (Media Matters for America)
      Always good to have a reference, this is it. "Rush Limbaugh is not backing down after widespread condemnation over his misogynistic attack on Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University Law School student who testified before Congress recently about the problems caused when women lack access to contraception. " Multiple clips for future show and tells.
    • America's Death Squads (Davies, PDA Community/ZCommunications)
      "Barack Obama has halted the macabre parade of hooded, shackled suspects in orange jumpsuits stumbling off American planes into the tropical sunshine at Guantanamo, but he has not done so by restoring the rule of law. Instead, to a great extent, he has replaced Bush’s policy with a global campaign to simply kill a wide range of people in cold blood: terrorism suspects, resistance fighters, and anyone else added to secret lists for secret reasons. From a uniquely American “exceptionalist” point of view, killing suspects instead of capturing them is a convenient way to avoid the embarrassment of sweeping up hundreds of mostly innocent people in an indiscriminate global dragnet and then not knowing what to do with them. The dead tell no tales. Public outrage is contained within the faraway countries where the killings take place and does not cause domestic political problems."
    • Corruption in Iraq: 'Your son is being tortured. He will die if you don't pay' (Abdul-Ahad, Guardian)
      Iraq ten years after: instead of one Saddam, many little ones. "Yassir was detained in 2007. For three years she heard nothing of him and assumed he was dead like his brothers. Then one day she took a phone call from an officer who said she could go to visit him if she paid a bribe. She borrowed the money from her neighbour and set off for the prison. "We waited until they brought him," she said. "His hands and legs were tied in metal chains like a criminal. I didn't know him from the torture. He wasn't my son, he was someone else.""
  • Subscribe

  • Meta

Blogged.com

Guilty or (likely) not, Troy Davis must die

Posted by Thomas Nephew on September 11th, 2008

No physical evidence. No murder weapon. Another man implicated.

No matter.  The state of Georgia says Troy Davis must die on September 23 for his alleged murder of a Savannah policeman 15 years ago — even though there’s no physical evidence and no murder weapon. And even though all but 3 witnesses (one of whom, Sylvester Coles, is a prime suspect) of an original 15 have recanted their testimony, citing police pressure to finger Davis once Coles implicated him.

With the case against him in tatters, Davis could not be convicted of the crime were a fair retrial held today. But the state of Georgia, United States law, and the United States Supreme Court agree: so what. As Amnesty International USA (AIUSA) wrote in June:

... Davis’ habeas corpus petition was denied by the state court on a technicality — evidence of police coercion was “procedurally defaulted,” that is, not raised earlier, so the court refused to hear it. The Georgia Supreme Court and 11th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals deferred to the state court and rejected Davis’ claims. Today the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear his case and Davis is now left without any legal recourse; he could be executed within weeks. It is shocking that in more than 12 years of appeals, no court has agreed to hear evidence of police coercion or consider the recanted testimony.

I’ll simply quote Amnesty International USA again regarding the significance of the case:

Amnesty International does not know if Troy Davis is guilty or innocent of the crime for which he is facing execution. As an abolitionist organization, it opposes his death sentence either way. It nevertheless believes that this is one in a long line of cases in the USA that should give even ardent supporters of the death penalty pause for thought. For it provides further evidence of the danger, inherent in the death penalty, of irrevocable error. [...]

The case of Troy Davis is a reminder of the legal hurdles that death row inmates must overcome in the USA in order to obtain remedies in the appeal courts. In this regard, Amnesty International fears that Troy Davis’ avenues for judicial relief have been all but closed off. In particular, he is caught in a trap set by US Congress a decade ago when it withdrew funding from post-conviction defender organizations in 1995 and passed the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act in 1996.

That 1996 law — signed, to his discredit, by President Clinton in the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing — was “expressly intended by Congress to sharply curtail the right of state prison inmates, under federal habeas, to challenge their state convictions and sentences. A key section of AEDPA bars a federal court from granting any habeas writ on an issue that was raised in state court, unless the state court decision ‘was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application, of clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.’” (Lyle Denniston, SCOTUSBlog, 5/5/05)

The effect on Troy Davis is that procedural roadblocks to reconsidering new evidence (or the collapse of old evidence) will kill him, unless public outcry prompts a commutation of the death sentence by the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles. For what Georgians and non-Georgians can do, visit the AIUSA web site or Troy Davis’s own web siteA clemency hearing has been scheduled for September 12; faxes and emails to the numbers provided below (again, AIUSA) will at least let the parole board know the whole world is watching.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible:
- explaining that you are not seeking to condone the murder of Officer Mark Allen MacPhail, or to downplay the seriousness of the crime or the suffering caused;
- noting that most of the witnesses whose testimony was used against Troy Davis at his trial have since recanted or contradicted their testimony, and that there is new evidence against another suspect in the case;
- noting that three members of the Georgia Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, dissented against the court’s refusal earlier this year to order a hearing on the post-conviction evidence of innocence;
- noting the large number of wrongful convictions in capital cases in the USA since 1976, and noting that unreliability of witness testimony has been a contributing factor in many of these cases;
- noting that the power of clemency in capital cases exists as a failsafe against irreversible error that the courts have been unable or unwilling to remedy;
- calling on the Board to commute the death sentence of Troy Davis.

APPEALS TO:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
2 Martin Luther King
Jr. Drive, SE, Suite 458, Balcony Level, East Tower
Atlanta, Georgia 30334-4909
Fax: 1 404 651 8502
Email: Webmaster@pap.state.ga.

But prepare to be deeply ashamed of this country on September 23.  In the long run, there’s only one sure way to prevent executing innocent people — and that’s to abolish the death penalty.

(Via Alternet)

=====

UPDATE, 6/15: Via comments by Mick and Nell, Ga. pardons board denies Davis clemency (Bluestein, AP). Via Nell, the AIUSA points out that needn’t be the pardon board’s final word, so keep those e-mails, faxes, and follow-up letters going. Also see Mick Arran’s several posts on the Troy Davis case, esp. including his July 16, 2007 post.
EDIT, 6/15: “Only one sure way” link added.

11 Responses to “Guilty or (likely) not, Troy Davis must die”

  1. mickarran Says:

    As you probably know by now, the Georgia Board of Paroles and Pardons turned down Davis’ clemency petition. The news reports were sketchy but it seems that the primary witnesses (to hear the local news outlets tell it) were the ex-police chief who was in office when MacPhail was shot and members of MacPhail’s family. If the Board heard from the ACLU or AI, it wasn’t reported locally.

  2. Nell Says:

    Oh, no.

    The Amnesty page linked in your post (’AIUSA web site’, near the end) says that the clemency board, despite their refusal to act on Friday, can step in at any time before the 23rd. So it’s more important than ever to get letters to them.

    The Macon article also refers to the possibility that the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case. If so, it’s just unbearable to think that the state is determined to rush ahead.

  3. Thomas Nephew Says:

    Thanks for the update, Mick and Nell. Maybe some new point can be raised by Davis’s lawyers in their return visit to the Supreme Court — or maybe the state board will reverse itself.

    (PS: didn’t see Mick’s comment in queue until this morning.)

  4. Nell Says:

    Finally, an update that is a ray of hope: U.S. Supreme Court issued a last-minute stay. All too last-minute, and the linked story introduces us to the McPhail family, who have long since converted their grief into blind vengeance.

  5. Nell Says:

    Another story, AFP, with more on the legal side (also not sure how long-lasting AJC links are).

  6. Thomas Nephew Says:

    Thanks for these, Nell. See also my “7p.m.” post on Tuesday for various other links about the story. In an update there, I read between the lines of a NYT article and a 1993 Supreme Court case, Herrera v. Collins. As ever, I am not a lawyer, but there *may* be enough there for the Supremes to hear the case, since the witness recantations directly erode the case against Davis.

  7. Nell Says:

    Thanks, Thomas; I don’t know how I missed seeing the new posts.

  8. Thomas Nephew Says:

    Many more thanks for checking back. My posting pattern is pretty unpredictable and sporadic, I’m not surprised you overlooked a new one. Even if you use RSS to scan for new titles, “7p.m.” is a pretty cryptic one.

    I see you have a bunch of new posts up about the bailout, here’s a link to one of them for other readers of this thread: “Letter to the editor - bailout.”

  9. Nell Says:

    I think the main reason I missed it is that there’s not a list of ‘recent posts’, only recent comments — and the video embedding glitch that creates such long empty spaces in the posts makes it that much less likely that I’ll see a post that’s no longer at the top of the front page.

    Lesson learned: I’ll scroll to the bottom when I see a new post, in case there are other, only slightly less new posts below.

  10. Thomas Nephew Says:

    I’ve now installed a “Recent Posts” in the left sidebar, just below “Blogroll” and above “Tag Cloud”. It’s now the 10 most recent posts; I think I can change that number.

  11. Nell Says:

    Thanks, Thomas!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>