a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

2008 presidential candidates on executive power: an interactive, downloadable spreadsheet

Posted by Thomas Nephew on December 29th, 2007

The spreadsheet below organizes the responses of twelve presidential candidates* to twelve questions about their views on executive power, in light of President Bush’s myriad abuses thereof. The questions were posed by the Boston Globe’s Charlie Savage; the Boston Globe web site with the questions and all the answers is here (“Candidates on executive power: a full spectrum,” Dec. 22).

I developed this so I could play around with grading the responses and see if I could find someone head and shoulders ahead or behind the rest of the pack. Rather than give the full answer to each question, I’ve excerpted the key part or summarized the answer; the full answer can be accessed via the candidate or question links. I graded on a fairly generous 0-4 scale, with answers I saw little or no problem with getting a 4, little problems getting a 3, and so on. I also gave -1’s to “declined to answer” or the like. The last two questions (about who advises the candidates, and whether they think all candidates should answer) struck me as less informative for my purposes, so I gave them lower weights in my results. The weighted average scores — 3.8 for Obama, 3.6 for Clinton in the image above — are the overall score to look at.

The upshot: I see much to welcome about the three top Democratic candidates — or at least expect of them — and little to make me think one or the other is definitely best on this score. Edwards spoke in more of a campaign soundbite format, Obama tended to give long answers. I was mildly surprised that I thought Biden (also prone to some very long answers) did the best overall of the Democrats, but again, the differences were slight. While I’m an Edwards supporter, his answers were sometimes not fully responsive to the question or my concerns for the future; thus, I didn’t reward him merely saying he didn’t “envision” disregarding a congressional statute limiting troop deployments. I’m not sure what happened to Kucinich and Gravel, but they’re missing from this survey, which seems a shame to me.

On the Republican side, I thought Ron Paul was far and away the best of the bunch, though he’d be merely in the middle of the Democratic pack given his answers to congressional limits on troop deployments, and making detainee habeas rights a matter of the specific war involved. McCain was, I thought, noticeably worse than any of the Democratic candidates — yet he’d be a huge improvement on Bush. Romney, on the other hand, distinguished himself by giving one disturbing answer after the other, perhaps most notably his answer to Question 7:

If Congress defines a specific interrogation technique as prohibited under all circumstances, does the president’s authority as commander in chief ever permit him to instruct his subordinates to employ that technique despite the statute?

ROMNEY: A President should decline …to provide an opinion as to whether Congress may validly limit his power as to the use of a particular technique…

… but also Question 10:

Is there any executive power the Bush administration has claimed or exercised that you think is unconstitutional? Anything you think is simply a bad idea?

ROMNEY: The Bush Administration has kept the American people safe since 9/11. The Administration’s strong view on executive power may well have contributed to that fact.

So given a chance to put some daylight, any daylight at all between himself and Bush, Romney chose not to. Elect this man at your peril, America.

But Giuliani, Thompson, and Huckabee, by contrast, distinguished themselves by not answering at all — something I can understand for one or the other question, but not for all of them. To me, the issue of overreaching executive power is one of the most fundamental and important issues of the past 7 years, and of this election; a candidate who refuses to inform the public about any of his positions doesn’t deserve anyone’s vote, and his voters are raising their hands that they’d like to live in a dictatorship.

But why take my word for it when you can download this spreadsheet and come to your own conclusions? I don’t see the stuff above as my final answer, for that matter; I could be convinced I’ve got the scores wrong for one set of questions or another, or for one candidate versus another.

Anyway, have a look. For a more convenient look at the spreadsheet itself, go here. To download it to your computer in a useable, interactive Excel form, click here.

* Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel either weren’t asked or didn’t respond in time — judging by how they’re not listed as “declined to state” for any of the questions.

UPDATE, 1/15: For other reactions to the questionnaire, see the estimable law professors Marty Lederman and Jack Balkin (”Balkinization”), as well as Andrew Sullivan, Arianna Huffington, Glenn Greenwald, and more.

14 Responses to “2008 presidential candidates on executive power: an interactive, downloadable spreadsheet”

  1. tom Says:

    It’s odd how Giuliani et al. seem to think that, not only does a sitting president have a right not to reveal certain information, but candidates still on the campaign trail shouldn’t talk about how they would handle national security and relations with Congress. Maybe their ideas on immigration, trade, and infrastructure are top secret too? Maybe we could just do away with all this debate stuff, measure the size of each candidate’s erect penis, and give the prize to the most generously endowed. Sorry, Hillary. You’re out of luck.
    Ok, I should apologize for that imagery.
    Nice chart.

  2. Thomas Nephew Says:

    odd how Giuliani et al seem to think that …candidates still on the campaign trail shouldn’t talk about how they would handle national security and relations with Congress
    Yup. It’s even odder that they have supporters who think that’s smart or tough or something. Said supporters should have a look at “50 most loathsome people of 2007” thing I ran across today. Giuliani and Huckabee are in it — #6 and #40-something. But #9 is…
    #9: You — Charges: You believe in freedom of speech, until someone says something that offends you. You suddenly give a damn about border integrity, because the automated voice system at your pharmacy asked you to press 9 for Spanish. You cling to every scrap of bullshit you can find to support your ludicrous belief system, and reject all empirical evidence to the contrary. You know the difference between patriotism and nationalism — it’s nationalism when foreigners do it. You hate anyone who seems smarter than you. You care more about zygotes than actual people. You love to blame people for their misfortunes, even if it means screwing yourself over. You still think Republicans favor limited government. Your knowledge of politics and government are dwarfed by your concern for Britney Spears’ children. You think buying Chinese goods stimulates our economy. You think you’re going to get universal health care. You tolerate the phrase “enhanced interrogation techniques.” You think the government is actually trying to improve education. You think watching CNN makes you smarter. You think two parties is enough. You can’t spell. You think $9 trillion in debt is manageable. You believe in an afterlife for the sole reason that you don’t want to die. You think lowering taxes raises revenue. You think the economy’s doing well. You’re an idiot.

    Not *you*, of course. Happy New Year!

  3. tom Says:

    If I may say so myself, I believe the following apply to me:
    “You hate anyone who seems smarter than you.”
    “You love to blame people for their misfortunes, even if it means screwing yourself over.”
    “You think you’re going to get universal health care.” Well, I hope.
    “You can’t spell.”
    But correct spelling is overrated anyway.

  4. Kevin Hayden Says:

    OT: would you give me a hollah via email?
    Happy New Year to you & yours!

  5. eRobin Says:

    Happy New Year!! I’m going with the over on this year’s greatness. Yay, 2008!!

  6. Thomas Nephew Says:

    Happy New Year, everyone! We were in NYC the last couple of days; got out just before — well, just as — the New Year’s Eve hoopla got going. I’m in NJ right now, still with limited Internet access. I’ll get to e-mail tonight.

  7. » Blog Archive » The Biden pick: could have been worse, I guess Says:

    […] by my admittedly subjective scoring, Biden had the best presidential powers survey score of all the candidates at the time. I gave him slightly better scores than Obama on questions on […]

  8. » Blog Archive » September 17 is Constitution Day Says:

    […] the candidates late last year for “executive power” issues (something I turned into a spreadsheet rating system and described in a blog post […]

  9. » Blog Archive » How that worked out: an election followup Says:

    […] my best to help raise the issues of Iraq, civil liberties, torture, global warming, Iran, and the rule of law during the election season, whether here on my blog or on doorsteps, at festival booths, and in […]

  10. » Blog Archive » Obama’s biggest "Lieberman" of all Says:

    […] in « « prior: 2008 presidential candidates on executive power: an interactive, downloadable spreadsheet next: Major Andrew Olmsted,, a.k.a. G’Kar (UPDATE) » […]

  11. » Blog Archive » Drones, civil liberties, and other stuff only a white person would write about Says:

    […] Lefties to Vote for Obama?” Henry Farrell waves this one off, but he shouldn’t; Obama expressly said in the 2008 campaign that he wouldn’t do that,* a lot of people believed him, it mattered […]

  12. » Blog Archive » Practice to deceive Says:

    […] (and generally good) stated framework on the issue of torture and other abuses of power, see “2008 presidential candidates on executive powers” (12/27/07) on this site. However, Charlie Savage’s questionnaire only addressed what […]

  13. » Blog Archive » Change we can accomplish Says:

    […] “a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we demand,” one who affirmed that a president “does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a […]

  14. » Blog Archive » Neither of the above — for now Says:

    […] me wrong. Either Obama or Hillary are miles better than any of the Republican alternatives — especially on issues of executive power, if not on the equally fundamental one of how to punish overstepping power by impeachment. Both of […]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> -- (comment rules)