newsrackblog.com

a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

  • Recent Comments

    • Thomas Nephew on Ladies and gentlemen: your infinitely cunning Democratic Party
    • Nell on Ladies and gentlemen: your infinitely cunning Democratic Party
    • Thomas Nephew on A city’s ‘city issue’ issue
    • Seth Grimes on A city’s ‘city issue’ issue
    • Joe Blunt on How’s that lesser evil thing working out?
    • Thomas Ray Worley on National Popular Vote vs. fixing the electoral college
    • Dan on County Council’s retreat loses respect — and Busboys
    • Thomas Nephew on From sundown towns to a midnight county
    • Bruce Godfrey on From sundown towns to a midnight county
    • Thomas Nephew on Were recalls the way to go?
    • ballgame on Were recalls the way to go?
    • Thomas Nephew on Were recalls the way to go?
  • Recent Trackbacks

  • Real News

  • RSS my delicious

    • In Congress, Dem and GOPer Working Together to Change the NDAA | Mother Jones
      "Smith and Amash's effort comes amid a bipartisan backlash against indefinite detention that has already produced legislation on the state level. Republican-dominated legislatures in Arizona, Maine, and Virginia have passed anti-NDAA legislation. Proponents of indefinite detention argue that Congress' 2001 authorization of the use of military force against Al Qaeda and the Taliban permits the indefinite detention without trial of American citizens, even those apprehended in the United States. But the Supreme Court has not definitively ruled on the issue. Opponents counter that indefinite detention of American citizens in the United States is unconstitutional."
    • Review & Outlook: The Tea Party's Inner ACLU - WSJ.com
      The Wall Street Journal has a conniption fit about conservative opposition to the NDAA: "The ACLU tea partiers may be well-intentioned but they are woefully uninformed about the war on the terror. Their efforts would undermine executive war-fighting authority and the legitimacy of a terrorist detention and military tribunal system that has been established over many Congresses, endorsed by two Presidents and confirmed by the Supreme Court. They should stick to shrinking the entitlement state."
    • Arizona Joins Virginia in the NDAA Exodus. Is Nullification the Next New Thing? (Cutting the Gordian Knot)
      "In less than a week’s time a second state has put a foot down making it clear that it will not cooperate with Federal Law which is blatantly unconstitutional. Yesterday Arizona became the second state to pass a nullification of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)."
    • How Obama Became a Civil Libertarian's Nightmare | | AlterNet
      “The major defining feature of the Obama administration on this issue is the eagerness with which it embraced the stunning evisceration of civil rights and liberties that was a hallmark of the Bush administration, and then deepened those outrageous programs,” said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, who is an attorney representing many Occupy protesters swept up in last fall’s mass arrests. “He has successfully counted on the acquiescent silence of the liberals.”
    • ‘I withdraw’: A talk with climate defeatist Paul Kingsnorth (Stephenson, Grist)
      I don’t think any “climate movement” is going to reverse the tide of history, for one reason: We are all climate change. It is not the evil “1%” destroying the planet. We are all of us part of that destruction. This is the great, conflicted, complex situation we find ourselves in. I am climate change. You are climate change. Our culture is climate change. And climate change itself is just the tip of a much bigger iceberg, if you’ll pardon the terrible but appropriate pun. If we were to wake up tomorrow to the news that climate change were a hoax or a huge mistake, we would still be living in a world in which extinction rates were between 100 and 1000 times natural levels and in which we have managed to destroy 25 percent of the world’s wildlife in the last four decades alone.
    • Chris Hedges: Someone You Love: Coming to a Gulag Near You - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig
      “You are unable to say that [such a book] consisting of political speech could not be captured under [NDAA section] 1021?” the judge asked. “We can’t say that,” Torrance answered. “Are you telling me that no U.S. citizen can be detained under 1021?” Forest asked. “That’s not a reasonable fear,” the government lawyer said. Advertisement “Say it’s reasonable to fear you will be unlucky [and face] detention, trial. What does ‘directly supported’ mean?” she asked. “We have not said anything about that …” Torrance answered. “What do you think it means?” the judge asked. “Give me an example that distinguishes between direct and indirect support. Give me a single example.” “We have not come to a position on that,” he said. “So assume you are a U.S. citizen trying not to run afoul of this law. What does it [the phrase] mean to you?” the judge said. “I couldn’t offer any specific language,” Torrance answered. “I don’t have a specific example.”
    • America brings the ‘war on terror’ home (Wolf, Daily Star)
      "(Judge) Forrest also repeatedly asked for assurances – at least five times – that the NDAA would not sweep up people like the plaintiffs: journalists engaged in journalism and citizens engaged in peaceful protest. Again, every time, the lawyers for Obama and Panetta said that they could not give her such assurances. [...] We now have it from the U.S. government lawyers’ own mouths: This law may put journalists at risk, or at least the lawyers explicitly refused to rule out that option for their client – and, as Forrest put it, they have “one very big client.”"
    • Obama’s evolution: Behind the failed ‘grand bargain’ on the debt (Wallsten/Montgomery/Wilson, WaPo)
      "That night, Obama prepared his party’s congressional leaders. He warned Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that he might return to the position under discussion the previous Sunday — that is, cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in exchange for just $800 billion in tax increases. [...] White House officials said this week that the offer is still on the table."
    • Not All Labor Leaders Happy With AFL-CIO’s Obama Endorsement (Elk, In These Times)
      “There's not a lot of choice here, that’s the sad part of this,” says Matt McKinnon, political and legislative director of the Machinists union (IAM), which is affiliated with AFL-CIO and endorsed the president earlier this year. “He’s been a disappointment in several areas, but he came through with some decent appointees.” The expected endorsement represents the reality that organized labor leaders still feel trapped in a two-party system, with a not-always labor-friendly Democratic Party on one side and a downright hostile Republican Party on the other.
    • Elections: What Are They Good For? (Swanson, War Is A Crime.org)
      Voting isn't everything. "I think Emma Goldman had a point in saying that if voting changed anything they would ban it. I think Howard Zinn had a point in saying that it doesn't matter who is sitting in the White House so much as who is doing the sitting in. The relentless ubiquitous question of how you can change the world if you refuse to engage in electoral politics strikes me as crazy. Women didn't vote themselves the right to vote. Workers didn't elect the eight hour day. India didn't vote the British out."
    • Part II Infiltration of Political Movements is the Norm, Not the Exception in the United States (Zeese, Occupy Washington, DC)
      "When the long history of political infiltration is reviewed, the Occupy Movement should be surprised if it is not infiltrated. Almost every movement in modern history has been infiltrated by police and others using many of the same tactics we are now seeing in Occupy. "
    • Critiques Of Libertarianism: A Non-Libertarian FAQ (Huben)
      "The purpose of this FAQ is not to attack libertarianism, but some of the more fallacious arguments within it. That done, libertarians can then reformulate or reject these arguments. This is also needed to help people place libertarianism and its arguments in context. It is very hard to find any literature about libertarianism that was NOT written by its advocates. This isolation from normal political discourse makes it difficult to evaluate libertarian claims without much more research or analysis than most of us have time for. Compare this to (for example) the extensive literature of socialism and communism written by ideologues, scholars, pundits, etc. on all sides. Libertarianism is scantily analyzed outside its own movement. Let's fix that."
    • UPDATED: Limbaugh's Misogynistic Attack On Georgetown Law Student Continues With Increased Vitriol (Media Matters for America)
      Always good to have a reference, this is it. "Rush Limbaugh is not backing down after widespread condemnation over his misogynistic attack on Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University Law School student who testified before Congress recently about the problems caused when women lack access to contraception. " Multiple clips for future show and tells.
    • America's Death Squads (Davies, PDA Community/ZCommunications)
      "Barack Obama has halted the macabre parade of hooded, shackled suspects in orange jumpsuits stumbling off American planes into the tropical sunshine at Guantanamo, but he has not done so by restoring the rule of law. Instead, to a great extent, he has replaced Bush’s policy with a global campaign to simply kill a wide range of people in cold blood: terrorism suspects, resistance fighters, and anyone else added to secret lists for secret reasons. From a uniquely American “exceptionalist” point of view, killing suspects instead of capturing them is a convenient way to avoid the embarrassment of sweeping up hundreds of mostly innocent people in an indiscriminate global dragnet and then not knowing what to do with them. The dead tell no tales. Public outrage is contained within the faraway countries where the killings take place and does not cause domestic political problems."
    • Corruption in Iraq: 'Your son is being tortured. He will die if you don't pay' (Abdul-Ahad, Guardian)
      Iraq ten years after: instead of one Saddam, many little ones. "Yassir was detained in 2007. For three years she heard nothing of him and assumed he was dead like his brothers. Then one day she took a phone call from an officer who said she could go to visit him if she paid a bribe. She borrowed the money from her neighbour and set off for the prison. "We waited until they brought him," she said. "His hands and legs were tied in metal chains like a criminal. I didn't know him from the torture. He wasn't my son, he was someone else.""
  • Subscribe

  • Meta

Blogged.com

The September 24 demonstration: what I saw, why I went

Posted by Thomas Nephew on September 25th, 2005

I went to the “March on Washington: End the War on Iraq” demonstration today. I met some online friends for the first time, and took a few pictures, and came away with a lot of impressions.

There were a *lot* of people. I didn’t arrive before the march began, so I didn’t get a look at the Ellipse before people started filing off to march past the White House. Afterwards, I heard on the radio that DC police chief Ramsey said he thought organizers had met their goal of 100,000, which suggests to me they probably got much more than that.

The ambience was festive, the signage imaginative and plentiful. One updated the old 60s slogan to “Make levees, not war.” Another said “Bush has done so much stuff I couldn’t fit it all on this sign.” A dance troupe of Iraqi bodies, led by a kind of pagan god drum major; people dressed as Cheney playing Bush on a marionette — and being played as a marionette by a devil behind him; Lady Liberty on stilts; “Billionaires for Bush” ironically supporting “Blood for Oil” and “Small Government — Big Wars” — in short, a wonderful, walking political circus.

It accompanied the thousands upon thousands of people with more serious signs. A seemingly endless chain of people carried a long cord with pieces of paper fluttering from it; on closer examination, the papers had names, portraits, and dates of death of soldiers. Other signs said “They Lied — They Died” with pictures of Bush, Cheney, Rice, and Rumsfeld atop a one and a half by two foot list of names in fine print. Other signs referred to Katrina; one black woman’s sign said “No Iraqis Left Me on a Roof.”

The march was also a chance to meet “eRobin” and her husband, and the Philadelphians they came to the march with — “Riggsveda“; Alana, Danny, and their folks — and “AltHippo“, a DC area blogger. It was a pleasure meeting all of them, particularly eRobin, who has been one of my most frequent stops in the “blogosphere.”

Lest anyone reading this be misled, I should say that it’s been a long, strange trip for me to get to this demonstration. As the record of this blog shows, I was initially skeptical of the looming war, but came around, basically in the belief that there was real WMD development going on that I assumed the Bush people would be able to prove. Obviously, that didn’t happen, any more than a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda could be shown.

Bush’s other supposed motivation — democracy in the Middle East — has been discredited by the immoral behavior his administration has allowed and encouraged, the lackadaisical approach to security in the aftermath of the fall of Baghdad, and the theocratic state that is on the horizon for Iraqis.

While it’s hard to pin down the correct proportions of stupidity, avarice, and depraved indifference involved in the Iraq debacle, it hardly matters as much as not having Americans pay for it with their lives and limbs and treasure any longer.

Nor should we pay for it with a diminished democracy here in the United States any longer. It was a blot on this country’s history that a known screwup and/or liar could be re-elected president, and that we (myself included) could allow a war in our name on such flimsy pretexts. Now the Katrina debacle seems to have finally taken the luster off what has been a Potemkin presidency — all show, no substance, photo ops and poses instead of competence and integrity. “Worst President Ever” was another popular sign, and it’s not too far off the mark.

In the meantime, though, we’ve become a less democratic, even brutalized country. Too many are all too ready to treat yet another swathe of humanity as subhuman; too many accept the diminishment of their own civil rights in the name of safety at all costs; too many accept the way elections themselves have become manipulated; too many are ready to smear and suppress dissent itself by any means necessary. At the end of the day, I care more about preserving real democracy in my own country than I do about trying to export it — let alone George W. Bush’s understanding of it — to another.

The only thing that made me waver before joining this demonstration was a feeling of responsibility towards a country whose blood was in some part also on my hands. But whatever the “mission” supposedly is in Iraq anymore, it’s not being designed, explained, or executed by anyone I trust. I can’t undo my earlier support for the war, however qualified and regretful it was. I can support not making it worse. I think our continued involvement in Iraq is making things worse. It’s time for us to go.

=====
UPDATE, 9/27: Riggsveda, eRobin, and altHippo describe the march.

3 Responses to “The September 24 demonstration: what I saw, why I went”

  1. Riggsveda Says:

    I can’t get the trackback to work, so here’s a substitute.
    Great time!

  2. Thomas Nephew Says:

    Yeah, I don’t know what’s going on with the trackback thing. Probably something I did. Thanks very much for dropping by. Yours is the best writeup yet.
    I’m truly kind of astonished at the crabbed putdowns from folks like Steve Gilliard, James Wolcott and Nathan Newman, who I usually feel like I’m catching up to. Like you, I found the march itself exhilarating — so many different people, so funny, imaginative, decent.
    Unlike Gilliard et al, I guess, I never have paid much attention to the speakers at things like this. Other than headliners like Sheehan, many are just ticks on the elephant, and people who focus on them miss the point by a mile. “Man does not live by bread alone.” We also need some poetry, some fun, and some sense how many people more or less agree with us to go along with the de rigeur thankless organizing, the reasoned arguments at 20 paces, and isolated coffee-fueled snarkery at 2am. I think that’s part of what events like the 9/24 demonstration do for people.
    [return to "The September 24 demonstration..."]

  3. Riggsveda Says:

    It’s not something you did. I had the same problem with trying to trackback to AltHippo and Robin. No problem at all doing it to Max’s post, though. And they are all Haloscan.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>