newsrackblog.com

a citizen’s journal by Thomas Nephew

  • Recent Comments

    • Thomas Nephew on Ladies and gentlemen: your infinitely cunning Democratic Party
    • Nell on Ladies and gentlemen: your infinitely cunning Democratic Party
    • Thomas Nephew on A city’s ‘city issue’ issue
    • Seth Grimes on A city’s ‘city issue’ issue
    • Joe Blunt on How’s that lesser evil thing working out?
    • Thomas Ray Worley on National Popular Vote vs. fixing the electoral college
    • Dan on County Council’s retreat loses respect — and Busboys
    • Thomas Nephew on From sundown towns to a midnight county
    • Bruce Godfrey on From sundown towns to a midnight county
    • Thomas Nephew on Were recalls the way to go?
    • ballgame on Were recalls the way to go?
    • Thomas Nephew on Were recalls the way to go?
  • Recent Trackbacks

  • Real News

  • RSS my delicious

    • In Congress, Dem and GOPer Working Together to Change the NDAA | Mother Jones
      "Smith and Amash's effort comes amid a bipartisan backlash against indefinite detention that has already produced legislation on the state level. Republican-dominated legislatures in Arizona, Maine, and Virginia have passed anti-NDAA legislation. Proponents of indefinite detention argue that Congress' 2001 authorization of the use of military force against Al Qaeda and the Taliban permits the indefinite detention without trial of American citizens, even those apprehended in the United States. But the Supreme Court has not definitively ruled on the issue. Opponents counter that indefinite detention of American citizens in the United States is unconstitutional."
    • Review & Outlook: The Tea Party's Inner ACLU - WSJ.com
      The Wall Street Journal has a conniption fit about conservative opposition to the NDAA: "The ACLU tea partiers may be well-intentioned but they are woefully uninformed about the war on the terror. Their efforts would undermine executive war-fighting authority and the legitimacy of a terrorist detention and military tribunal system that has been established over many Congresses, endorsed by two Presidents and confirmed by the Supreme Court. They should stick to shrinking the entitlement state."
    • Arizona Joins Virginia in the NDAA Exodus. Is Nullification the Next New Thing? (Cutting the Gordian Knot)
      "In less than a week’s time a second state has put a foot down making it clear that it will not cooperate with Federal Law which is blatantly unconstitutional. Yesterday Arizona became the second state to pass a nullification of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)."
    • How Obama Became a Civil Libertarian's Nightmare | | AlterNet
      “The major defining feature of the Obama administration on this issue is the eagerness with which it embraced the stunning evisceration of civil rights and liberties that was a hallmark of the Bush administration, and then deepened those outrageous programs,” said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, who is an attorney representing many Occupy protesters swept up in last fall’s mass arrests. “He has successfully counted on the acquiescent silence of the liberals.”
    • ‘I withdraw’: A talk with climate defeatist Paul Kingsnorth (Stephenson, Grist)
      I don’t think any “climate movement” is going to reverse the tide of history, for one reason: We are all climate change. It is not the evil “1%” destroying the planet. We are all of us part of that destruction. This is the great, conflicted, complex situation we find ourselves in. I am climate change. You are climate change. Our culture is climate change. And climate change itself is just the tip of a much bigger iceberg, if you’ll pardon the terrible but appropriate pun. If we were to wake up tomorrow to the news that climate change were a hoax or a huge mistake, we would still be living in a world in which extinction rates were between 100 and 1000 times natural levels and in which we have managed to destroy 25 percent of the world’s wildlife in the last four decades alone.
    • Chris Hedges: Someone You Love: Coming to a Gulag Near You - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig
      “You are unable to say that [such a book] consisting of political speech could not be captured under [NDAA section] 1021?” the judge asked. “We can’t say that,” Torrance answered. “Are you telling me that no U.S. citizen can be detained under 1021?” Forest asked. “That’s not a reasonable fear,” the government lawyer said. Advertisement “Say it’s reasonable to fear you will be unlucky [and face] detention, trial. What does ‘directly supported’ mean?” she asked. “We have not said anything about that …” Torrance answered. “What do you think it means?” the judge asked. “Give me an example that distinguishes between direct and indirect support. Give me a single example.” “We have not come to a position on that,” he said. “So assume you are a U.S. citizen trying not to run afoul of this law. What does it [the phrase] mean to you?” the judge said. “I couldn’t offer any specific language,” Torrance answered. “I don’t have a specific example.”
    • America brings the ‘war on terror’ home (Wolf, Daily Star)
      "(Judge) Forrest also repeatedly asked for assurances – at least five times – that the NDAA would not sweep up people like the plaintiffs: journalists engaged in journalism and citizens engaged in peaceful protest. Again, every time, the lawyers for Obama and Panetta said that they could not give her such assurances. [...] We now have it from the U.S. government lawyers’ own mouths: This law may put journalists at risk, or at least the lawyers explicitly refused to rule out that option for their client – and, as Forrest put it, they have “one very big client.”"
    • Obama’s evolution: Behind the failed ‘grand bargain’ on the debt (Wallsten/Montgomery/Wilson, WaPo)
      "That night, Obama prepared his party’s congressional leaders. He warned Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that he might return to the position under discussion the previous Sunday — that is, cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in exchange for just $800 billion in tax increases. [...] White House officials said this week that the offer is still on the table."
    • Not All Labor Leaders Happy With AFL-CIO’s Obama Endorsement (Elk, In These Times)
      “There's not a lot of choice here, that’s the sad part of this,” says Matt McKinnon, political and legislative director of the Machinists union (IAM), which is affiliated with AFL-CIO and endorsed the president earlier this year. “He’s been a disappointment in several areas, but he came through with some decent appointees.” The expected endorsement represents the reality that organized labor leaders still feel trapped in a two-party system, with a not-always labor-friendly Democratic Party on one side and a downright hostile Republican Party on the other.
    • Elections: What Are They Good For? (Swanson, War Is A Crime.org)
      Voting isn't everything. "I think Emma Goldman had a point in saying that if voting changed anything they would ban it. I think Howard Zinn had a point in saying that it doesn't matter who is sitting in the White House so much as who is doing the sitting in. The relentless ubiquitous question of how you can change the world if you refuse to engage in electoral politics strikes me as crazy. Women didn't vote themselves the right to vote. Workers didn't elect the eight hour day. India didn't vote the British out."
    • Part II Infiltration of Political Movements is the Norm, Not the Exception in the United States (Zeese, Occupy Washington, DC)
      "When the long history of political infiltration is reviewed, the Occupy Movement should be surprised if it is not infiltrated. Almost every movement in modern history has been infiltrated by police and others using many of the same tactics we are now seeing in Occupy. "
    • Critiques Of Libertarianism: A Non-Libertarian FAQ (Huben)
      "The purpose of this FAQ is not to attack libertarianism, but some of the more fallacious arguments within it. That done, libertarians can then reformulate or reject these arguments. This is also needed to help people place libertarianism and its arguments in context. It is very hard to find any literature about libertarianism that was NOT written by its advocates. This isolation from normal political discourse makes it difficult to evaluate libertarian claims without much more research or analysis than most of us have time for. Compare this to (for example) the extensive literature of socialism and communism written by ideologues, scholars, pundits, etc. on all sides. Libertarianism is scantily analyzed outside its own movement. Let's fix that."
    • UPDATED: Limbaugh's Misogynistic Attack On Georgetown Law Student Continues With Increased Vitriol (Media Matters for America)
      Always good to have a reference, this is it. "Rush Limbaugh is not backing down after widespread condemnation over his misogynistic attack on Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University Law School student who testified before Congress recently about the problems caused when women lack access to contraception. " Multiple clips for future show and tells.
    • America's Death Squads (Davies, PDA Community/ZCommunications)
      "Barack Obama has halted the macabre parade of hooded, shackled suspects in orange jumpsuits stumbling off American planes into the tropical sunshine at Guantanamo, but he has not done so by restoring the rule of law. Instead, to a great extent, he has replaced Bush’s policy with a global campaign to simply kill a wide range of people in cold blood: terrorism suspects, resistance fighters, and anyone else added to secret lists for secret reasons. From a uniquely American “exceptionalist” point of view, killing suspects instead of capturing them is a convenient way to avoid the embarrassment of sweeping up hundreds of mostly innocent people in an indiscriminate global dragnet and then not knowing what to do with them. The dead tell no tales. Public outrage is contained within the faraway countries where the killings take place and does not cause domestic political problems."
    • Corruption in Iraq: 'Your son is being tortured. He will die if you don't pay' (Abdul-Ahad, Guardian)
      Iraq ten years after: instead of one Saddam, many little ones. "Yassir was detained in 2007. For three years she heard nothing of him and assumed he was dead like his brothers. Then one day she took a phone call from an officer who said she could go to visit him if she paid a bribe. She borrowed the money from her neighbour and set off for the prison. "We waited until they brought him," she said. "His hands and legs were tied in metal chains like a criminal. I didn't know him from the torture. He wasn't my son, he was someone else.""
  • Subscribe

  • Meta

Blogged.com

Augstein demands air conditioning for Camp X-Ray

Posted by Thomas Nephew on January 29th, 2002

Another* cri de coeur by Rudolf Augstein, publisher of German newsweekly Der Spiegel, as he contemplates Islamist terrorist boo-boos and aggravations in Guantanamo Bay following their richly deserved beating in Afghanistan. In last week’s crocodilian lament, Ach Amerika! (”Oh America!”), Augstein asks his German readers to join his horror at the American military blindfolding, shaving,** and even (gasp) chaining the prisoners from Kandahar. You almost expect Augstein to complain that the Geneva Conventions require pocket money and a half day of free unstructured time a week. Especially, of course, if the detainees belong to organizations more akin to the Mafia or high seas pirates than anything international jurists ever paused to consider over coffee and cake at Geneva.

I can understand that Augstein’s self-interest may make him hope for a nice little prisoner uprising, it would make great copy no matter what happens: if Americans wipe out the uprising, it might be a tasty war crime to bitch about; if Americans die, why, those jack-booted thugs are finally getting some of their own medicine. If only the uprisings were interesting when they happen to Pakistanis; they get them all the time. Just last week another six hapless foot soldiers paid the price for their superiors’ continued and suspicious incompetence in guarding and transporting Al Qaeda prisoners.

The point of the Geneva Conventions must surely have been — well, I don’t know that, start over — surely ought to have been to assign rights and responsibilities to the signatories, and to establish a mutually beneficial and reciprocal standard of behavior. Where that expectation has no hope of being met, the Conventions shouldn’t be flogged into one last mile after another of service they ought not to have been intended for. There are perfectly good grounds and reasons not to assign prisoner of war status to these guys: if just carrying a gun openly and fighting U.S. forces turns out to be a ticket to Geneva Convention prisoner of war treatment, look for drug runners, narco-terrorists and any of twenty or thirty million numbskulls between Rabat and Djakarta to jump on the bandwagon next.

But maybe it isn’t the Geneva Conventions Augstein cares about, maybe it’s … animal rights?

The accommodations in Guantanamo’s “Camp X-Ray” mocks every description. The internees are held in 1.8 by 2.4 meter open cages, in hot, humid climate. Were chimpanzees corralled this way, animal rights groups would be beside themselves.

My goodness! That’s awful! Open cages in a humid climate… no, wait, that makes sense, unless there’s an air conditioning clause in the Geneva Conventions. 1.8 by 2.4 meters… OK, it’s not the Ritz. Europe being what it is, I imagine there’s a regulation being born in Brussels as we speak fixing terrorist open air cage dimensions at 2.0 by 2.6 meters.

Meanwhile, there’s a reasonably urgent need to interrogate them — not torture them, interrogate them — and P.O.W.’s can’t be interrogated beyond name, rank and serial number. So people who abandon common sense about these bastards are asking us to walk away from some of the best leads we have about where the next attacks are planned, for no apparent better reason than to preen their smug superiority. International law can’t possibly be well worked out about the highly unusual circumstances that the Taliban and Al Qaeda present. I’m not saying beat these guys to within an inch of their lives, and throw them in The Hole for four months — I got over that by September 13th or so. But I am saying that when I get a finger wagged in my face about reasonable, hellishly careful precautions — physical and legal — with unreasonable, hellish people, I’d like to break off the finger and feed it to its owner. Augstein concludes,

The Americans can only get on their high moral horse if they let themselves be measured by their own standards. A democracy is always only as good as its behavior towards the (allegedly) worst terrorists.

So that’s how to measure democracies! Who knew. Well, I guess all those bagels, cream cheese, and prayer mats are money well spent. Clearly, Americans are less interested in moral equestrianism than Augstein. But just as clearly, there’s nothing to be ashamed of at Camp X-Ray.

=====
* I discussed Augstein’s writings on 9/11, Israel, and the U.S. a couple of weeks ago. Didn’t like him then, either.
** Re shaving: I’ve read a number of suggestions why this was done, including lice, and simply to tick the guys off, which would be good enough for me. My guess, for what it’s worth, is that long beards could plucked and woven into ropes and thus weapons without much trouble; plus you can hide stuff in them. So off they go, and off they stay. If that all bugs Augstein and his ilk, that’s just icing on the cake. If it runs against the International Understanding on Terrorist Facial Hair, let me suggest it’s time for a new conference in a lovely Swiss resort. Surely we can all get behind that.

And credit Jim Henley with the point about last week’s uprising in Pakistan.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

«« prior: Thank you